FANDOM


(Created page with "My problem is it was history, describing an event in which the character colored what exactly the event was. While it is true to an extent to state that Qrow said the infiltr...")
 
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
While it is true to an extent to state that Qrow said the infiltrator was the same one who assaulted Amber, that is not what Qrow was implicating in that scene with his word choice, which your description of "Same one who assaulted Amber months before" fails to convey.
 
While it is true to an extent to state that Qrow said the infiltrator was the same one who assaulted Amber, that is not what Qrow was implicating in that scene with his word choice, which your description of "Same one who assaulted Amber months before" fails to convey.
   
His choice of words "also responsible for" indicates she is the one responsible for both entire assault(which was actually an assault by 3 people, which is something your edit fails to account for) and her specific condition, which was actually not caused by the assault, but rather by the bug/glove(which again is not accounted for in your edit wording)
+
His choice of words "also responsible for" indicates she is the one responsible for both entire assault(which was actually an assault by 3 people, which is something your edit failed to account for) and her specific condition, which was actually not caused by the assault, but rather by the bug/glove(which again is not accounted for in your edit wording)

Latest revision as of 08:45, October 27, 2018

My problem is it was history, describing an event in which the character colored what exactly the event was.

While it is true to an extent to state that Qrow said the infiltrator was the same one who assaulted Amber, that is not what Qrow was implicating in that scene with his word choice, which your description of "Same one who assaulted Amber months before" fails to convey.

His choice of words "also responsible for" indicates she is the one responsible for both entire assault(which was actually an assault by 3 people, which is something your edit failed to account for) and her specific condition, which was actually not caused by the assault, but rather by the bug/glove(which again is not accounted for in your edit wording)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.