FANDOM

VedranTheII

Content Moderator Discussion Mod
  • I was born on August 17
  • I am Male

Greetings and welcome to this small corner of my soul, hope you’ll enjoy your stay.

I’m a PC gamer on (near) minimal wage that enjoys anything that has a lot of heart put into it; be it a game, a story or even a simple question.

If you have some of the later to share, fill free to do so. I won’t promise to give an answer you will like, but I will give you an answer...with a little bit of my heart put into it. 

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • I want you to tell me how every single sentance in that paragraph has been supported by the show. That paragraph is an embarrassing reminder of how down hill this site has really gone so please explain to me how that entire paragraph is supported by the show.

      Loading editor
    General Esdeath
    General Esdeath closed this thread because:
    This is just going to be repetitive from now on.
    15:33, February 9, 2019
    • View all 35 replies
    • I'm going to close this thread now. It is already elaborated that the paragraph in question is about Cinder's Grimm Arm Graft, and not Salem's abilities.

        Loading editor
    • TheSDCSecretary wrote:
      Arkantos95 wrote:
      TheSDCSecretary wrote:
      To me? Nobody who knows what they're talking about pulls the "That's your opinion" card in a debate.
      Nobody who knows what they're talking about shifts goalposts every time their points are batted aside in favor of logic.
      I never shifted goal posts. That fact that you're suggesting that just proves my point that you aren't really thinking this through.

      First it was "this entire paragraph is speculation".

      Then it was "this doesn't cover my speculation so it's clearly wrong".

      Then it was "You guys don't know what you're talking about, despite literally giving me an itemized list of why I was wrong on the first point."

        Loading editor
  • Thanks for the screen captures, exactly what I needed for the Argus page

      Loading editor
    • Appreciate it, but the person you should thank Chish. She did the capturing, while I just helped upload some of them cause she was busy.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Thanks for that, man.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I noticed you said something on the art page after I posted a picture, but I can't see it because the page isn't working for me. Could you tell me what you said?

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • At the bottom of the "Jaune's fate in later volumes..." thread, a user has alluded to events in the most recent episode, typing "Volume 5, Chapter 11." It's not much, but people, especially those on this wiki, can read between the lines and extrapolate. It might be best to remove that comment as a precaution.


    Also, I'm a bit out of it. When does the next episode air? I heard there was a bit of a gap planned.

      Loading editor
  • Hello, I've been trying to add things to categories like putting White Fang under antagonists but for some reason I've been having some troubles. Do you know what I might be doing wrong?

      Loading editor
    • I'm not sure what issues you were having, as when I edited it it worked fine.

      The way I did it was by going into source mode and at the very bottom of the page typing Category:Antagonists (no spaces) between two sets of square brackets [[ ]].

        Loading editor
    • He's probably using the button on the page itself to try and add the category...in which case it sounds like the wiki is being silly again.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Why was the information I added to the boarbatusk page removed, was it redundant?

      Loading editor
    • View all 7 replies
    • Work in this case, which is why I left a note in the edit explaining why I took it out.

        Loading editor
    • VedranTheII wrote:
      Work in this case, which is why I left a note in the edit explaining why I took it out.


      Okay thanks.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • My apologies for that, and thank you for removing it; I had forgotten about the spoiler rule. 

      Loading editor
  • That "speculation" had existed since a third of the fourth volume had passed, and is already largely widespread in multiple articles and subarticles. I wasn't the one who came up with it even.

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • ah ok Yeah makes sense now. lol

        Loading editor
    • Yes. Yes it does.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Did you even look up the definition? A syndicate doesn't have to be about achieving financial goals. You literally could just look it up on google and I'd be right. The "common interest" can be more broad.

      Loading editor
    • syn·di·cate (sĭn′dĭ-kĭt) n. 1. An association of people or firms formed to promote a common interest or carry out a business enterprise.

      Actually yes, a couple of sources just to be sure. Though you are right that the simplest definitions did not mention a financial goal, any and all expanded info on syndicates I've found explicitly mentioned the business aspect of it, which maybe applies to Roman, but not to Ozpin's or Salem's group.

      I brought the matter to the attention of the other staff members and will come back to you on the matter once everyone chimed in

        Loading editor
    • I've always known syndicates as being a financial thing, in that they earn money. Crime syndicate, finance syndicate; they're all businesses (both shady and not) who's main goal is earning money for the syndicate. It's also far more organised than what both Salem and Ozpin have; Salem has a Dictatorship over her minions, and they do what she says. Ozpin has a Politician's leadership over his group. A syndicate on the other hand has checks and balances for those in charge to adhere to, which both Ozpin and Salem are lacking.

      I remember there being a conversation ages ago with SYUTK about precise definitions and making sure we use ones that have proper definitions instead of fitting by the loosest terms, because for people who English is not their native language it can get confusing if they go looking up a word and it means something other than what they thought it meant.

      It is for this reason that the majority of staff who weighed in feel like syndicate is not the right word to use; once you get into the proper meaning of the word, none of the groups actually fit it. So, I have taken the usage of syndaicate out of the page on behalf of staff.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.