User blog:Amber and-Crystal/Is it right to judge by the full songs?

Firstly, sorry if this has already been done.

Now, I've been wondering for a while wheather it is right for us to make conclusions based on the full version of a song, or a song like I may Fall which is only heard for a short period of time in the show itself, during the credits. I'm not saying that these versions don't matter, but maybe it's just not acurate to the show.

I'm not saying this is the case, however if we're all honest, how many of us look up the soundtrack to a (non-musical) movie/show? Do people look up the full length songs in any movie, let's say 'Holes' and look up all the songs? With this example I know there is the  song Keep'n it Real by Shaggy in it, but only for a five-ten second bit. Now these ten seconds were accurate to the move, but the rest wouldn't be (I'm not saying it would be necessarilly wrong for it, just not right). And no, i didn't look that song up, I just reconised it.

If we look at Red Like Rosses part 2 in the show it is only the first part, presumidly through Ruby's perspective. Now the parts that are said to be Summer Rose or whoever that turns out to be, and back to 'Ruby' may not apply to the show. Couldn't they be in-appliable because they weren't really in the show?.

I also came to the thourgh that it could still aplly to the logic of only having the show versions for it, but the full being like easter eggs for those willining to look for them, which many of us have apparently done.

I don't necissarilly suscribe to this theroy but I belive that it is worth stating, and am curious if others render it reasoniblle