Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-25266931-20161109232722/@comment-26018514-20161111050622

KNN005 wrote: Someone:

1) I'm not saying I even want it to be a war, I was thinking it becoming a "war hell" because Salem and Oz have been beefing for who knows how long and now teens have been drawn in.

4) Again. When I say someone's someone else's weakness, I just mean they know skills that counter the foe's skills. Sniper trumps bodyguard. Bomber Pilot trumps sniper. Like that. And that is just an example, not literally what I meant. Even if someone is a trump to another foe the foe can over come it. Like in Pokemon when a ground type fights a water type. 9 times outta 10 the water one wins. But what if the ground one is so fast it hits the water one before it even gets a water gun off? Victory. No match up is clean clear cut.

5) ... And the characters are too smart for me to ignore tactical angles.

6) As long as this doesn't become a "Only Harry Potter can defeat Voldemort even though he's no where near the best wizard... 1. No, it is in no way a "war hell", it's a "survival hell", completely different philosophies and MO's

4. The show already does this... You are simply the one insisting "But mah fire support must take on the tank boss 1 vs 1 and Win(or at least be close)", while exclaiming you don't like the sniper so why can't the guy with sword kill a man at 1000 paces... You cannot pick and choose your argument, you gave this one up before.

5. Tactics are as varied as there are people, YOU are not the arbiter who decides which are used by every character, characters should be making their own decisions and thus using vastly differing tactics from each other, they should not all be thinking a single tactical thought process that agrees with your own, even if some of those tactics are or appear stupid... people ARE stupid, we make mistakes, if we didn't, War would not exist and no-one who engaged in it would ever lose.

6. Unfortunately, Ruby likely will be the one to kill Salem with her SEW power(or at least need to be the one to kill her forever, lest she rise like a lich), fortunately, she likely will require her team behind her to get to that point, and likely has a lot of growth before that point.

Arkantos95 wrote: KNN005 wrote: Arkantos:

That was an example. It didn't "fail", it conveyed a point. The point being I don't want thing to end up that way. I never said they were already that way. Yes, it did. It failed because the analogy was incredibly flawed based on how the show has progressed. We have no reason to believe that it will end up that way. I Agree with Arkantos, you failed to convey a point(specifically your point, maybe you conveyed another, but this is no-where near the same argument as before) on this one, accept the loss and move on