Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-27404492-20170708180328/@comment-34633327-20170914211515

Nikoli the rebel wrote: @KingFubuki92 Stop. I want to talk to your superego. Not your Id. Read through what you just have typed. Look for inconsistences and contradicitons. This may be shocking but "writing in the heat of the moment" is not a recipe for good ideas. Its a recipe for shitty ideas.

Yesterday you said "3rd Crusade is a code word" was a headcanon and today you say that its not headcanon. I guess the definition of headcanon changes when you decide it changes.

The all-caps, exclamation points, and long paragraphs are common symptoms of an internet rant. I am not going to respond until you re-edit your last post, breaking up your third paragraph, and removing exclamation points.

If you talked to someone in public at the volume that you write most people would ignore you. It seems there has yet again been another misconception.

First. I was not angry when I typed that. I typed it out, then proofread it several times to make sure I had my facts correct, while also rereading your posts so I did not mistake anything from your posts.

Second, the all capital word was for the point of Emphasis, not anger. The larger text brings more attention to the reader imo.

Third, I said code phrase, and the thread has the evidence to prove it. If you are going to accuse me of something, at least read the prior posts to make sure you don't mistakenly accuse me of the wrong thing.

Fourth, my paragraphs are long as I try to keep all my thoughts as clear and concise as I can. When I talk with people irl, people easily misconstrue my words due to apparently not phrasing it properly, so by going in depth, I hope people are able to understand my point more easily, in addition to any facts and interpretations needed to aid it.

Fifth, my definition of head canon never changed. My definition of head canon is an idea generated for a show that is treated as canon by the interpretor but lacks substantial evidence to support it. I offered evidence in my statement, but I never said I fully believed it, I said it as counter/more easily justified theory to yours, and only came up with the theory when I was typing it.

Sixth, I will not go back and break up the paragraph, doing so would only create smaller paragraphs but with unsatisfactory information clumps when it is much easier to read as one paragraph.

Seventh, I am not angry right now, I am actually relaxing and watching some episodes of Blue Bloods I never watched before, so do not attempt to write my response off as an anger rant.