Talk:Adam Taurus/@comment-30038925-20180824183853/@comment-30038925-20180824193750

@ ChishioKunrin

Thanks for the long reply.

1. That was the thing I felt the marks were being too superficial. I'm merely saying that these red marks can have more interpretation beneath. There is potential.

2. It did show Sienna and Adam were comrades, but such time could be used in telling why he became so bloodthristy. For me, I think the first man got killed was really an accident, which he had explained to Blake in the scene. Most people said he was manipulating, but I sincerely don't trust the opnions came from people who already hate him to death. Anyway, the short lacked of transition.

3. The point indeed was clear, but the assassination had no spark at all. It was reasonable, but from a storywriter perspective, it was not interesting to the audiences. When did the disobedience started? Where was the turning point that made Adam slowly going his own way instead of listening to Sienna? In the short, I only nothing of those. Of course, we can easily say that "because he is a cold-blood monster doing what he does". He may be a cold-blood monster, but lacked of development in between.

Thanks again for your opnion. I do agree what you wrote, but I just think the team can do better in this short.