Thread:Lauren Darkmore/@comment-5200387-20170120022119/@comment-6493589-20170120030027

Ah, apologies, I saw the messages on the ban shortly before heading out and didn't get around to answering once I got back.

Anyhow, I explained on the initial ban notice your infractions, Flame-baiting Blume, Continuing an argument after being told to stop, and bringing issues to the wiki chat that had no place being there. e.g. Directing your friends over to the wiki as the place to reprimand Blume for his actions on your CaH game. Compared to Blume only continuing the argument after being told to stop, he receives a shorter Ban than you, it may have even only been a week had he not had previous bans.

The user that the message in the screen shot in question was directed to had a discussion with me in PM and later agreed that the 1 month was justified. Therefore I saw no reason to lower your ban. I am allowed to change my mind and I did after looking over what happened and agreeing with said user that 1 month is a fair time for the policy infractions.

In short; you broke more rules than he did, ergo you received a longer ban despite it being your first.