Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-28831435-20160703040107/@comment-25936766-20160703200406

VedranTheII wrote: 1-Trigger has much less budget and staff than RT does. Even focusing only on the budget and staff RT used for Volume 1 exclusively, Trigger still has far less.

2-We're not talking about 3D costs vs 2D costs, we're talking about a 2D version of RWBY. So any comparisons between the costs of a 3D show and a 2D Show are completely irrelevant.

3-I was not talking about RWBY's budget, but RT's as a whole. Everyone knows RT are not a rich company. And RWBY's budget was much lower in Volume 1, both because RT didn't want to risk as much, and because they didn't have as much money as they do right now. And Trigger still has less budget in comparison, in pretty much every work they make (except for literally 1.)

4-Budget does not equal Costs. Costs substract from the budget, but by themselves are not Budget. Budget is how much money you have to spend, Costs are how much you will spend. But paying a lot does not change the fact you that that amount of money to begin with.

You got $1M, spend 980.000 vs You got $400, spend 200. The former wasted more budget, yes, but the former still had the biggest budget of the two. You can, for starters, achieve much higher-quality stuff with $1M than with $400.

In other words: Costs are irrelevant, it's the budget what is in question. How much do they have to begin with, not how much do they end up losing.

Excuse me if I seem angry. It's just your general ignorance and attempt at arguing despite said ignorance has pretty much killed my mood and given what I've seen here I feel no reason to tolerate it much. What you're doing is like if you knew nothing of Physics and yet tried to argue about Physics against someone who has at least High-School level education about Physics as if they were wrong.