Talk:Breach/@comment-99.120.149.4-20150203014919/@comment-24891101-20150208024923

Reminiscing time already? It's been less than a week.

While typing this, I had wanted to try to list the logical fallacies (going through wiki) this guy used, but his argument is so very strange that I'm having difficulty wrapping my head around it. I can (I think) see ad populum ( hi assertion that everyone knows), petitio principii (seemingly everthing he said), false equivalence (asserting the situation is the same as KNS), false analogy (same), proof by assertion (again, everything), special pleading (thinking this is different from any other time a member of a work's creative team dies), and mind projection (he thinks, therefore it is so).

Wow. That cannot possibly be right. And yet, seemingly, it is. Damn. And this is on top of refusing to provide evidence, denying the existence of evidence, claiming enough time has passed that history bears him out, claiming things are obvious which are not, and generally being a moron.