Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24198837-20140421023639/@comment-24198837-20140424001724

XDex wrote: I think we've gotten away from the point. Theres a difference between "we've" and "you've". I admit that I went off topic. My bad.

XDex wrote: Nothing in this thread even remotely suggests that Humans are superior. If you re-read my first post, you'd realize that this ^ is not my point. In fact, " I personally think that man is superior... [however] who we call superior is more a matter of personal preference than fact".

Me, in my original post, stating a preference.

XDex wrote: The fact of the matter is that there is no evidence to support such an assertion. My evidence is logical conclusions, drawn from what we've been told (which I've already listed). While it's not cannon, it's speculation. A theory. Like any theory, not everyone has to think it's fact untill it's proven. For all we know, General and Special Relativity is a complete sham. I choose to think it's fact because it makes sense to me. Same idea here.

Sorry to beat a dead horse, but I had to respond to this at least.

In terms of the current topic, I see no reason why Faunus of two different animals couldn't breed. I mean, why would we call them all "Faunus" if they were all incompatible? If they couldn't, it could be the reason that there's (apparently) so few of them, like Arkan said, but it seems unlikely that they could survive with the diversity that they do with such a restriction. Faunus and Humans should be able to breed, in theroy. Their bodies are similar enough, much like how Superman can have kids with humans despite being an alien from another planet.