Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-4830106-20140921022402/@comment-24993958-20141211203837

But IS what is wrong wrong because you can right the wronging? Or is what is wrong wrong because it’s no your right, but not necessary the right right, which in this case is their right and...ok that makes no sense…let me try that again…join me please to a memory or mine…

A friend of mine asked me to review a crossover fic for him, a genre I absolutely LOATHE, but I agreed to do it if he made sure to take my criticism, aka the scenes I felt where wrong, with a grain of salt, because I knew most of the scenes I’d find wrong were not inherently wrong, it just didn’t appeal to me. He asked me to elaborate.

Can I criticize a comedy show just for having jokes? Or can I criticize an action movie for being violent? Or can I criticize a movie for not being as long as a 12 episode show? No I can’t, as far as I’m concerned, and I can’t help but feel this applies to this show.

Since episode 1 this show has been nothing but a third action, a third humor and a third character, and it’s a recipe that has stuck both through volume 1 up until now…can you really criticize a show like this for not being gritty, when that has never been the focus? Yes the universe would have allowed this show to be Dark, it would have allowed it to be Tragic, but they chose not to take it…and good or bad, it’s their show and their choice to make, and I don’t think hating them for making a choice you wouldn’t serves any purpose…and now I’m rambling again…am I making sense here?