Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-30530552-20170401005801/@comment-25936766-20170420134629

SpiritedDreaming wrote:

1-The steps you have to take to even connect Lisa to a colour are so far beyond ridiculous it's not even funny.

2-And might I point out the irony in trusting Wikipedia to be correct? 1-"Lisa is a common (even if likely only in spanish-speaking countries) name for Mugils." Yeah, very ridiculous. It's like saying someone called Tuna doesn't fit CNR because only english-speakers call that fish Tuna.

2-Wikipedia, at the very least, is far more reliable. It has billions of contributors that provide information and verify it. And unlike what most people seem to ignore, it also has multiple admins of various kinds that make sure the articles follow the rules, same as here. This includes demanding sources, references of some sort, when needed. And yes, they do discuss things and their validity as well. But unlike in Wikias, those things happen in the background.

So yes, I trust in Wikipedia to be at least mostly correct a million times more than something that was based on personal experience, that doesn't list any sources, or whose information is seemingly entirely copy-pasted from a website or book letter-per-letter as if it was some reference book.

It's not ironic. It's only logical. The idea that Wikipedia is unreliable is a retarded notion used by old teachers that don't know how Wikipedia works but do know lazy students only copy-paste.