Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-14061097-20160420195004/@comment-68.194.169.97-20160522130429

SomeoneYouUsedToKnow wrote: Retro Ace wrote:

And that's why I'm fed up with this, characters like her being made into sacrifices, they should all get happyilly ever afters There is no "Should". Should implies that they must. Who are you to decide what should and should not be done? Your reasons for this are entirely selfish as well.

It's a common plot device to kill characters like Pyrrha, yes. Doesn't mean their deaths should be undone. Especially when it was their deaths what acted as catalysts for the development of the others.

I lost a cousin and grandfather on the same year I know about moving on believe me, but there's nothing wrong with making an AU where they get a happy ending especially if it fuels the development of other characters like mine, I just want to prove that characters like Pyrrha can have happy endings and are more than something to be sacrificed or killed off, that's all I want, I can move forward but I prefer doing it my own way, not others telling me how

Reviving them all because you think they "should" get a happy ending, ruins the message of moving on since the characters can just pick up where they left off instead of moving forward.