Board Thread:Administrative Requests/@comment-24032889-20180227035303/@comment-25936766-20180228015347

RaijinRising wrote: I didn't know exactly how to shorten that. I think I didn't touch it much for fear of getting something wrong in the rewrite or leaving something important out. Well, I can't really do it myself ATM since college is being bitchier than I thought it would be this time, but I imagine one way to do it is to:

1) Read the whoping 43 lines.

2) Note down the specific points it talks about (like, "ego", "sadism", "disdain for Ruby", stuff like that).

3) Do it yourself from scratch, following the Wiki's rules (like using Murican grammar rules and stuff), making sure it is factual instead of speculative, and trying to keep it relatively-short (say, aiming for 16 lines max.)

4) Compare with the original, make changes as appropiate regarding the info if it's too different semantically from the original.

Not sure if I'm making the process sound more simple or complicated than it really is. But basically, my idea for how to do it is to describe Cinder yourself in not-too-much text, then compare to see how well you got it.