User blog comment:Maki Kuronami/Lesson 24: Why the Naming Rule of Remnant Exists/@comment-11188061-20140926022058/@comment-11188061-20140926042207

The point is that his spoken words and thought processes are contradictory.

He praises Ruby for taking action immediately upon seeing something suspicious, which seems to be his philosophy. Fair enough.

But when Ruby raises a suspicious point about the woman, he instantly refutes the evidence by saying that it's too general. I'd expect him to say, 'alright good job identifying a trait, anything else so we can narrow down the list?' because he seems like he wants to catch this culprit this instant.

And then when Ruby raises a point about the southeast hideout, he without any hesitation wants to send all of his army to that place and eradicate the opponent. Even though his only source of information was a first year Huntress who clearly said it ''in contrast to her own statements. ''The hell? Suppose that the above paragraph is his usual state, why on earth didn't he question Ruby's words like Glynda did and suddenly want to take 'immediate' and incredibly drastic action?

Again, if this is his true philosophy, then why did he not say earlier, 'good, now let's find out who has glowing Dust clothings and grab them in for questioning - surely you can try to identify the culprit at least, Ruby?'?