Board Thread:Administrative Requests/@comment-24728342-20160321201257/@comment-4579191-20160321213701

We're not suggesting this bot as a replacement for a mod when none are in chat anyway. It's simply just so evidence can be reviewed if needed. A human mod will always be superior but there's also the chances things can be missed.

I'm going to interject this quickly that I showed earlier in a group screenshots can easily be manipulated to change what was said. I understand that this will not always happen but it can throw doubt on what was and wasn't said. Having a secondary evidence can be more important than a screenshots cropped to remove contexts which can happen.

Please don't assume this to be a sign of distrust, or surveilance. Surveilance is already carried out to an extent with mods watching chat. I understand your scepticism but the only intent behind this was to make sure all bases are covered on dealing with malicious users