Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-27966940-20170517013010/@comment-25936766-20170704214827

WC-83 wrote:

1-We all seem to have gotten off on the wrong foot, and much as I'd like to have something to do on the wiki, I'm not interested in letting the anon become the new KNN.

2-As for it not working in Remnant, i think it's fine (since chances are the only person objecting to a sacrifice in a village that believes it's nessecary is the one being sacrificed).

3-Now please calm down and stop trying too hard. We get easily annoyed by awkward behavior (particularly SYUTK up there). 1-Dude, are you in love or something? You have some weird compulsive obsession with bringing up his name even on things he has absolutely no relation to.

Seriously, every 9.5 out of 10 times someone mentions KNN, it's you, and almost every single time, he has nothing to do with the conversation. Can't you think of anyone else?

The comparison is terrible anyway. The anon, at worst, is making faulty arguments and a joke so bad it didn't even look like it was a bad joke. KNN, meanwhile, was a childish, egocentric moron who ignored any ideas that did not support his own. Very different.

2-Negativity attracts Grimm. Grimm bring panic and death. That brings more negativity. Which brings more Grimm. That's why it would not work.

The villages as they are already walk on thin ice without actively causing negativity, and in a flash they can end up with almost everyone dead and most buildings wrecked, especially if a strong Grimm just happened to pass by one day by chance.

One that actively causes negativity, even if on a small scale, would have far less chances of growing, at best. Becoming a Kingdom before any of the canon Kingdoms? It's absurd.

3-How dickish of you. I've been pretty tame so far in this discussion, even in the large post above.

If you want to call any names, call out Ray, whose patience and tolerance seem to have taken a dive recently, and not solely on this thread or regarding this anon.