Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-25266931-20161109232722/@comment-25266931-20161111032645

Arkantos:

That was an example. It didn't "fail", it conveyed a point. The point being I don't want thing to end up that way. I never said they were already that way.

Someone:

1) I'm not saying I even want it to be a war, I was thinking it becoming a "war hell" because Salem and Oz have been beefing for who knows how long and now teens have been drawn in.

2) Rock paper scissor was just an example. That's why I said "like rock paper scissors".

4) Again. When I say someone's someone else's weakness, I just mean they know skills that counter the foe's skills. Sniper trumps bodyguard. Bomber Pilot trumps sniper. Like that. And that is just an example, not literally what I meant. Even if someone is a trump to another foe the foe can over come it. Like in Pokemon when a ground type fights a water type. 9 times outta 10 the water one wins. But what if the ground one is so fast it hits the water one before it even gets a water gun off? Victory. No match up is clean clear cut.

5) I like DMC and KH games but I still want to plan and think when I see a battle. I don't want to just see sweet action only with not tactics behind it. That's mindless. And the characters are too smart for me to ignore tactical angles.

6) As long as this doesn't become a "Only Harry Potter can defeat Voldemort even though he's no where near the best wizard in any way but he is the chosen one" type of thing then fine. All I want is lots of tactical skill and teamwork and no battles with foes killing whole towns with a wave of their hand.