Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-6493589-20150619172544/@comment-24389754-20150626041553

Mercen-X wrote: We don't have any basis of understanding what they meant. We've been shown that NORMAL Nevermores are pretty much the size of the average crow. It could be concluded that the team did not mean to imply that the Nevermore was larger than a Nevermore would ever normally grow. Also, it's easy to claim the small Nevermores were fleeing, but it's harder to prove. Just because the creatures are small, doesn't mean they are without basic attack skills. The Nevermores could have been flying up to prepare dive attacks which are more effective than simply trying to peck at a target. Small Grimm are dumb because they are given to attack rather than to bide their time, not because they don't know how to kill. Quick question:  What would it dive attack?  The Grimm have been confirmed to only prey on humans.

Also, "Size and strength are corollated to each other and to age. Age is corollated to intelligence." What happened to 'A=B, B=C, but A=/=C.' Also, I didn't take Geometry to point out that, mathamaticly, A would equal C. If line A is congruent to line B, and line B is congruent to line C, then by extention, line A is congruent to line C.

To add to this, you know that the first Nevermore Ruby hit was the average size because? Where was it ever stated that that was the normal size of a Nevermore? Plus, who brought up anything about that Nevermore playing any role except to give us a size comparision? You're grasping at straws that have nothing to do with the argument.

Plus, your Oobleck quote actually helps to prove our pont: "You see, the Grimm you see before you are so powerful, so superior to the Grimm you fought, that they've undoubtedly lived hundreds of years, and in that time between killing humans and attacking our borders, they have done one important thing: They've learned. " Translation:  Big Grimm = Smart Grimm.