Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-24993958-20160721222431/@comment-25936766-20160730153941

Phantomlink959 wrote:

tl;dr, even if they can meet CNR, they don't, because that's not what the writers intended. If we turned down things that can fit the CNR's criteria simply because "the creators may not have intended that", then many canon names that fit CNR should have their examples of it removed, because no one knows what the writers thought when naming them, and thus no one can say for certain that they did intend or did not intend those names to fit CNR.

For all we know, maybe they did think of the James River in Texas when naming Ironwood. Turning it down simply because you think, but do not know, that the writers did not do it on purpose, is a faulty argument, because again, you do not know what they think.

And precisely for that, the argument is dismissed.