Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-27082610-20170624011641/@comment-25936766-20170711224154

2600:E008:40:8AF0:280:AEFF:FE3B:CC2F wrote: 1) I understand them because of Years of Research (2-5 years) metaphorical, or are they?! 

2) There've been been countless disappearances linked to unknown phenomena, chances are some are Dimensionally and Otherworldly related, of course none are ever really solved my good sir. 1) This entire sentence is non-sensical due to the way it's worded. I understand Ark being instantly confused.

2) Sure, we known nothing about the universe, or multiverse, at large, and most of the things we "know" are just theories treated like facts, because as long as it was made by a Scientist, "Theory" = "Proven Fact" in the eyes of the average joes.

Sure, as a result chances are that some unknown disappearance, or some other thing, is indeed related to unknown Dimensional/Otherwordly phenomena that we can only imagine at the moment.

However, that entire sentence still fails to show how/whether you understand what Pocket Dimensions are. Also, you should've added a comma after "solved", it would've made the sentence less confusing.

---

Also, a tip that is more in-general than strictly related to the quoted post:

Before you make a post, think not on what to say, but how to say it. Arguments are meaningless if they are made in a way no one understands.