Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-27144409-20160815140118/@comment-25936766-20161129010009

Melke98 wrote: 1-First of all you can't exactly use Adams attack as an example... Since you know... It didn't exist at the time of the death battle... Just saying.

2-Though Final Heaven, weren't they saying that the force Yang took was against the Paladin was enough to make it at least comparable?

3-Or the fact that the final heaven was a one shot deal and it's the only thing that could really unleash any major damage against her?

4-As flawed as Death Battle is I haven't seen any real good arguments for this,

5-perhaps they showed Yang taking it TOO easily but they showed reason as to how she could take it at all in the analysis. 1-Black Trailer, son. Black Trailer.

The attack existed. All Adam did in V3 was use a faaar less charged version of it. And yet, it was still enough to one-shot Yang and take off her arm in a single hit.

2-Lol, the Paladin's punch was nowhere close to Final Heaven in power. Hell, due to the size of the fist, the force was far less concentrated, meaning the punch was actually weaker than it seemed. Comparing the Paladin's punch to Final Heaven is like comparing a slap from a wrestler to a full-power Kamehameha.

3-More than "any major damage". It should've dealt more damage to Yang than Adam's barely-charged Moonslice did. And we know how much damage that dealt.

4-Then you haven't been looking.

5-First of all, the guys at DB admitted themselves long ago: Their analysis is not 100% perfect, they are wrong at times, and even the analysis team can be divided on conclusions of who is stronger or how much is a character capable of.

Second of all, they did not. Especially since they greatly misunderstood what her Semblance actually does.

And third of all, the analysis and the fight itself lose ethos due to the acquisition at the time, and all the RWBY V3 advertisement in the fight.