Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27234079-20190413013142/@comment-25936766-20190526230452

0551E80Y wrote: The post I left on your wall would also agree with me. .............Did you seriously, unironically, just say that you agree with yourself? Did you seriously just say that you yourself agree with yourself as if it made you more "right"?

That is both impressive and sad. Just shamelessly admitting that you have a 1-person circlejerk.

Sentry 616 wrote:1) You can't make too many changes to a flying city, since each time you do it you're changing the weight distribution and wind profile, and a new flying would be very expensive.

2) I don't want hidden,I want overt militarization with weapon emplacements all over the fracking place. I've wanted to see major border emplacements since Breach. 1) True, but in theory it can still be done, especially when the nation doing it is the most advanced on the planet and the one with the most Dust. 2) But that would also make it obvious to invaders where Atlas can attack and how and etc. long before they arrive, so they would lose a tactical advantage. Of course, assuming Atlas really has a lot of cannons hidden inside the rock. There could also be aesthetic reasons for not being so overt with the military stuff....though that would be OOC for Ironwood.