Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-25857155-20150630215852/@comment-25555436-20150712002333

JayHart wrote: Second in the lists is LiveandSound's Han Purpureus Lovecraft. Some things I forgot to add. Before I forget:

-Dude, did you want me to get down to the real specific with the weapon description? Like how many atoms are in there, how many particles, how many inches, what kind of metal, the shape of the blade, the shape of the missiles, the color, the visual effect, how he carries it, how he swings it upwards, how he swings it downwards, how he fires it, how he reacts when attacked, everything? It was never required to be too specific anywhere in the rules, was it?

To answer your questions: The cannon is placed on one side of the blade (so yeah, this means it can only slash from one side). And the shape, just use your imagination. I said it was blue and multi-part. The rules never stated it had to be more specific.

-The "Buff" part was because of a category I had when it came to Semblance classification. It includes anything that needs to be activated but whose effects are constant instead of inmediate or short-lived. Later divided it to Sustained and more-common Buff categories, but that was long after posting that Semblance there.

The utility part however, there is nothing wrong there, which gets me bothered in how you don't see it. Utility=Any Semblance whose effect is neither directly offensive or defensive in use, and is just for Utility. Like Ruby's Dash. By itself, it's just a dash. Is a dash offensive? Nope. Defensive? Nope. Can it be used for said purposes? Yes. But is it's effect supposed to directly be used for said purposes? Nope. That said, how could you not see how it was Utility? A summoned figure is just a figure, whether it's supposed to attack or defend the user depends on how it's used. This is probably what irritated me the most.

Other than that, I understand.