Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25247233-20160513080632/@comment-27121183-20160523200706

Kyuubi10 wrote:

It's about whether the action was ethically correct or not. Let us not forget that giving an employee special priveleges and freedoms which are not being made available to others is ethically wrong. They took away Shane's perks and special considerations and this troubled Shane. What do you mean I have to go to a boring stoyboard meeting as part of my payraise agreement?)

''My god, those are some absolute bastards at RoosterTeeth! How do they sleep at night?''

I've been debating the business side because that's about the only logical discussion we can have without hearing from all parties involved. None of us proclaimed Shane to be lying, which means we took his letter to be the truth.

If anything, I'm one of RT's biggest critics and I don't think they were the best choice for RWBY. I just dislike it when people take the squishy way out of conversations and try to feel their way out of logic and real-world experience.