Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-30231626-20161015043220/@comment-30231626-20161016000243

SomeoneYouUsedToKnow wrote: 1-Then you should have quoted that one and/or responded to that one, not to mine. Like any rational person would've done.

2-Except his family Symbol is not the topic of discussion. Thus, it is irrelevant. And in my post, that you responded to, I did say how while Phantom said Emblems were made "for cool", the actual point was "for the lulz". No symbol is intended to be serious entirely. Some may be symbolic, like Yang's, others not so much, like Sun's.

3-Using quite literally the words posted by another user in the very same thread to try to save face. The most unoriginal, uncreative way to argue.

In his opinion, 2/4 is a lot. In my opinion, a lot means a high amount, regardless of percentage. Now, what's your opinion? Not Vedran's, but yours? Wow, your butthurt.

first off i was replying to the whole conversation chain, which is why i had his comment and yours in the quote that i replied to with. i could have been more clear, and on that count i apologize, however your extreme reaction to all of this is disgusting.

secondly it IS relevent to the discussion. just because somehting isn't EXACTALLY the topic of the conversation, doesnt mean its irrelevent. my point was stating that the bunny symbol is probably a joke symbol, and his family symbol is ment to represent him in the mannor that everyone elses symbols do. this is in NO WAY irrelevent. something irrelevent would be going on a gaint tangent that i copy and pasted a quote to summerize how i feel about something.

and lastly the bit about quoting vedrans is a gross overeaction. i agree with his opinion, he stated it very well and i was in total agreement. i see nothing wrong with pointing out that another comment summerizes very well about how i feel about a matter.