Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-79.169.109.250-20141218173133/@comment-26018514-20160930171219

MiniDaggers wrote: Zoeblo wrote: but don't both need to agree to it? If they want to be together I don't see why they wouldn't. If one doesn't want to sign the thing that stops them getting half your stuff if you guys split, it kinda suggests that's what they are there for.

Unless, of course, I'm missing something. From what I understand there are situations in which a pre-nup can be considered not legally binding... though I'm not entirely sure what can qualify as I do not know what disqualifies them or what was written(if the situations I've heard of had an "out" clause written in rather than this just being the standard for all pre-nups for example).