Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-25266931-20161212225518/@comment-25936766-20161216213607

KNN005 wrote:

GreyStark wrote: I understand your view point on racists, rapists and child molesters, isn't BDSM just down to sexual preference? It doesn't seem morally repugnant. I dont like BDSM or orgies because its too much hedonism and irresponsibility for me. My mother was in the Urban League and tried to teach the rest of the hood to practice safe sex. 1-I understand calling orgies "hedonistic and irresponsible", given all the risks....but BDSM? What part of BDSM is even slightly hedonistic or irresponsible?

2-So in BDSM, there's no "safe sex"? Just ignorant. In fictional BDSM, they make it look like the guy gets whipped until their back looks like a tomato in color, like sexualized physical abuse....but in real life, it's very different.

BDSM, real BDSM, requires the concent of both parties at all times. Things never go too far, and the moment either side thinks they are, they both stop. Instead of sexualized abuse, it demands actual care for each other, and a need to "play safe". Whipping the other party without a care for how they feel? That's not how BDSM is done.