Thread:HazelQuill7445/@comment-26111940-20161031170718

Hi, Hazel.

I already know that there is no proof. I merely stated it as a possibility to explain this as-of-yet unclear point. I made the fact that it is only a possibility clear in what I have written, so there's really no reason for the edit to be taken out. Is there still a problem with what I've written? I'm slightly confused as to why you're seeing a problem with it, seeing as other attempts to explain things, or mere conjecture, has been made on other pages (such as Pyrrha and Yang's page where unproven statements are made, such as someone likening the characters of Yang's name to Bruce Lee's, or suggesting where Pyrrha's semblance came from).

In light of this, would it be possible for you to explain why the edit was removed as such things are allowed on other pages as they potentially explain things that have not yet been explained?

Thanks,

EagleTsubasa 