Talk:Crocea Mors/@comment-90.31.122.153-20161103023929/@comment-25936766-20161103034318

Like Sentry originally said, it really does depend on the interpretation.

-Some versions of Arthur's tales make Excalibur a radiant, magnificent magical sword so bright it can blind entire armies.

-Some versions of Arthur's tales make Excalibur a different, unrelated weapon to the Sword in the Stone.

-King Arthur was sometimes portrayed as carrying Excalibur more as a symbol, and using a more normal sword for combat.

-Excalibur originally wasn't even Arthur's sword, but Gawain's.

That, and, of course, Excalibur's actual appearance varies based on the artist. I cannot say it looks more like Excalibur, because how does Excalibur even looks?