Talk:White Fang Lieutenant/@comment-50.161.156.191-20151021033041/@comment-3257939-20151021045902

It's not about if it coming up with a rebuttal or not. It's about the fact that most of the rebuttals need to go into the crazy speculation territory and be against a lot of things that we know about the show.

It works like this: Red dust is for fire. Confirmed. But then, a character is killed by a masked blonde so a theory about Jaune being the killer is born with the reasoning that there is a chance that Blue dust is actually for fire which can explain how he did that even though he didn't have Red dust at the moment.

It's not silly to be fair. It's completely justified. Everything seems possible but there has to be a limit to speculation. Otherwise, it will make every other theory look far fetched.