Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-108.180.145.133-20130922140854/@comment-18396318-20130925205630

ImposterParrotGrass wrote: Kyvos wrote: I think it's probably just that humans (and animals) are mostly light with some dark, while Grimm are mostly dark with some light. Or maybe animals are equal light and dark. Pyrrha said that humans have souls, dark and light in them, and that Grimm have no souls, and only dark. So I think there's an antithesis to Grimm, and it's not humans.

"The monsters we fight lack a soul. They are creatures of Grimm, the manifestation of anonymity. They are the darkness, and we are the light."

"Right, that's why we fight them!"

"It's not about why; it's about knowing. Understanding dark and light helps us manifest our aura. Everyone has some of both."

She does say that humans have souls, while the Grimm don't. She also does say that the Grimm are the darkness, bus she does say that humans are the light. She then follows it up with a statement that everyone has some darkness and some light. If the light can have some darkness, why can't the darkness have some light?