Thread:Flashfire212/@comment-24993958-20160218120245/@comment-24993958-20160218123717

I’m simply trying to highlight cynicism has nothing to do with my thought process, as I’ve pointed out cynicism can exist in your idea as well, be it from the potential implication that Jaune or Ruby aren’t quite over Pyrrha’s death, or from the concept of naming a kid that wouldn’t be alive if Pyrrha lived, because canon hints Arkos would have both been and stayed a thing, ergo Ruby and Jaune wouldn’t have had this child you and I keep butting heads over, implying indirectly the kid is merely a replacement for their dead friend.

What we have here is…perhaps a priority list is the best way to describe it. I prioritize the hypothetical kid over Jaune and Ruby, hence why naming her Pyrrha bugs me, while you (and I’m assuming the majority of the people you asked) prioritize Jaune and Ruby over the hypothetical kid, resulting in your liking of the idea. Don’t get me wrong, I am a cynic, and I’m quite happy to be one…but cynicism has nothing to do with my distaste for this whole ordeal.

