Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-35941743-20190304195312/@comment-26018514-20190702035618

NVDelta wrote: I mean...the Death Star kinda is a valid argument against that, to an extent. not even close, the "death star" even had he used it on EVERY LAST PLANET(no-where near his stated objective with it) held a planets worth of living organisms by itself.

again, I'm not arguing scale of destruction, I'm arguing scope of intent.