Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-4830106-20130810030606/@comment-16502426-20140509202452

Arkan421 wrote: XDex wrote: My original objection is mostly to the notion that them being evil makes the user evil. I don't see how setting animals loose on the world to cause chaos would be any better than Grimm. Well the difference being is that animals in the RWBYverse seem to be neutral, while Grimm only seem to have the sole task of killing people based on backstory given in Episode 1. Yes, but it doesn't matter whether or not all animals would kill you, when the particular animal in front of you is killing you.

My dad's friend lived with a tame lioness. That doesn't mean the pissed off tiger that is in front of me isn't going to kill me.