Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32346149-20191222183116/@comment-37076256-20200103235425

73.Anon.52 wrote: TheSDCSecretary wrote: SizzlinBLT presented the facts for me, maybe go reread what he said and maybe not blindly skim through this time. reread every post since as ALL his arguments were proven to be interpretations of facts, not facts themselves by those of us who can look at them and interpret ways they have not been proven false, and do note that in my own post I gave an example of a true retcon: Dew Gale's staff and Green/White Wind dust.

I never said RWBY lacked ret-cons, I said that those examples were not proven ret-cons, and that if you purely watch the show and don't get hung up on side material like AA, Comics, Shorts, cons, or the companion book, there are very few ret-cons in the episodes of the Volumes.

Edit: missed your post b4 posting this spirited. So basically you're kinda just saying "Well if you don't really pay good attention to the series you don't really notice the retcons." I didn't need you to tell me ignorance is bliss.