Thread:Shayanomer/@comment-24573226-20171023161257/@comment-24573226-20171023164251

It's true. Staff decided that creating pages for the VAs of one-time appearance minor characters wasn't necessary. When you started creating them we simply decided to roll with it, because it wasn't causing any harm.

This time, however, it's pretty clear that you had prepped your own version of the VA's page, and when you saw that it was already up, replaced it with your own version. Not cool.

I'm happy to change the photo to one more recent and include biographical information that was missing but is readily available to find online legally. The twitter reference has to stay, though, for the spoiler reason mentioned above. We actually already had an incident with a member of staff being accused of abusing their power as an admin and breaking the policy because the user didn't know about that particular VA's tweet claiming their role.