Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-26417457-20190727003315/@comment-34690754-20190810145552

Wilfred J. Pemberley wrote: JoeProKill2000 wrote: every single character you liked is one that has never harmed anyone we like. If your one of those people that hate a character for harming another character, such as cinder for killing Pyrrha, that’s not a real reason. And a lot of characters that are evil, you seem to want them to be good. And iiliah is basically Adam just redeemed. They took every redeemable quality of Adam and have it to her. 1 - Only one of the villains in this show killed someone I like (I don't give a damn about Penny), and I gave you ample reason as to why she's a terrible villain. Please don't ignore everything I wrote and then create a strawman to attack instead. It's childish.

2 - I only expressed the desire for redemption arcs for Hazel and Emerald. If two characters qualifies as 'a lot' to you, then you're using hyperbole to undermine my argument. Stop that; also childish. Furthermore, neither Emerald nor Hazel are evil.

3 - Who the hell is Iiliah?

4 - Did you seriously give your own comment a kudos? Dude, really?

1. You stated that you liked someone who didn’t harm anyone we cared about, read your own text, or just read in general.

2. Your basically saying every good villain we have currently (except Tyrian, They can do so much with him if they expand on him) except Salem should be a good guy. Redemption arcs doesn’t always mean they are redeemed to be a good guy.

3. Read the last sentence of my first point. You can’t read. Oh no, I misspelled a shitty characters name who should have never been in this show, whoops.

4. Yes. Now, since your obviously one of those people who started watching Rwby in volume 5 or 6, I recommend you stop trying to argue with someone who knows way more about the original show than you and probably more about the show now.