User blog comment:Jkphantom9/Shane Newville: "An Open Letter to All Who Treasured Monty Oum"/@comment-222.29.114.3-20160513204121

what made you guys  think that volume 3 has better story telling under the circumstances where they didn't and hardly want to  figure out  true purposes of some characters and events? It is just me or actions in fights and specific weapons have played a role in storytelling and character depicting? I definately agree that V3 has more excellent perfomance on cinematic skills than before, but the construction of the last two episodes just makes me sick and unnerved. Adam forgets his iai stlye that now only can be seen in Japanese Manga, Black shows nothing worrior but to be a abused kitty, and that Yang can do anything little but have arms chopped. And dammed what their personalities originally are!

Okay, it depends on one's  type and someone just can't get badass fight scenes. It depends on the time limit we call.

Then, what made you think there is a casual link between MO's absence in production and better story telling in volome 3? Think to the opposite possible situation, what if Monty was alive and in charge? Does that really mean storytelling wouldn't be as good as what we have seen without his part? Tthe whole advanced story telling thing isn't just because the story has reached its climax?

No evidence so far support that Monty's creation would ruin the story telling. Raven's show-up added after the credit is fxcking awesome, and within a beautiful style. Maybe only Asians find it easier to figure out the pipeline products of cinematic narrative and the cool anime presentation with sincere creativity.

Anybody knows Hayao Miyazaki's workflow? Pretty much like Monty's and by which he creates unique works.