Thread:Bluethunder25/@comment-38646250-20190325080836/@comment-24018437-20190326215240

Sentry 616 wrote: But it's not. You're a (villian obsessive) fan, not a creator. This isn't your baby, it's theirs, and they get to make the calls, good and bad.

Agreed. RT knows the characters better then we do. You may not like what they did, but in the end, they know Adam best. They know what he would or would not do. They understand his character and know everything there is to know about him. In the end, they have the right to do whatever they want.

And frankly, I'm glad you aren't in charge of RWBY. You would have made it one big redemption story where every villain somehow regrets what they did and join RWBY through the power of love and friendship. Villain redemption is common and predicteble nowadays, as is showing them mercy. I can't count the amount of times where a protagonist had an antagonist at gunpoint and decided to let them go for...reasons. I never get that, to be honest. They usually kill a shit ton of goons to get to the big bad, but they spare the one in charge? That's just hypocritical. Not every villain can or should be redeemed. And you want to redeem almost every freakin' one in the show through ways that just don't work in the overall narrative or fit the characters.