Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-27404492-20170511131216/@comment-141.134.109.210-20170619230652

@SomebodyYouUsedToKnow Yeah, until you read the entire comment I wrote to you I am not bothering with responses. I don't like people not reading everything the other person writes before writing a response. Even if you view it as garbage the person put time and effort in it and sometimes it contains actual usefull data. I shall not promote the method you are using. I prefer you take your time to read everything through before formulating a response. We're not racing against time.

@Arkantos95 Having forcefields and a personal army at your command is always usefull for any child of the CEO of the most by terrorist targeted international corporation. It would be foolish if he could have it, not to have it. That said however.

I concede, you have won the argument. I can not find any back up for counter arguments with the little screentime we have gotten for him. You managed to point out things I could ill defend and as such have the stronger stance until more information is released about him.

Whitley is an antagonist however. A villain is a malicious individual that fight against the protagonist. An antagonist is merely an obstacle. Every villain is an antagonist, but not every antagonist is a villain. A force of nature is not evil, but we still say it's an antagonist. Whitley is an antagonist because Weiss a protagonist as of now wants to be heiress to the SDC, a position he occupies thus he becomes an antagonist by default.

Or we could simply say that the wiki labels him as an antagonist.

Regardless it has been a decently pleasant discussion. For that my thanks.