Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-98.235.191.26-20140721085214/@comment-17099359-20140722193658

KillerKlown12 wrote: Akin.toussaint wrote: KillerKlown12 wrote: Akin.toussaint wrote: KillerKlown12 wrote: Akin.toussaint wrote: KillerKlown12 wrote: Akin.toussaint wrote: Regarding the false advertising point.Thats not a fair comparison.Movie trailers advertise scene's it are actually in that 2-3 hour run. The RWBY trailers on the other hand advertise story points that will be touched apoun at some point during the series.

You can't sue someone for not hinting at story points the way you want at done as quickly as you want it done.(a least I hope you can't) What story points do they advertise? Monty himself has said that the Red trailer is completly opposite of Ruby's personality due to him not knowing just who Ruby was going to be.

If you don't know what you're making, don't advertise.

To the last one. It's not beacuse he didn't do them as fast as I wanted; it's beacuse he didn't do them ''at all. ''Again, I make a anime, but the scences I advertised are not at all in the first half of the season, and the second half doesnt seem to have it either if the trailer is anything to go by.

How much crap would I be in if I did that?

For some reason you guys keep defending it, and I don't know why.

However you can't say that he doesn't plan to get to it at some point during the series.He may touch on it in volume 2 or 3 or 4 e.t.c. My point being that the RWBY trailers advertise points that will get touched apoun in the seires.What these trailers  didn't promise that these points in will get touch volume one.Its not fasle advertising becasuse he didn't exactly say when points will touched apoun. Okay...again, I make a trailer for a game. Game comes out, the advertised conten isn't there, I say. "Well, it MIGHT be in the second, third, or fourth game."

Would you accept that? I'm assuming not.

Again, an anime advertises a scence, in the first season none of the advertised content is there. This is THE DEFINITION of false advertising. I make a product, make it look to be something it's not, and when people get mad I just shrug and say it MIGHT be in the next prodyct I make.

Take your blinders off, apply your philosophy to ANY other product, media form, or thing people either buy or consume. You will find it is a failure.

This ad campain is unacceptable, and as fans of RWBY you need to hold the creators responsible for their actions pretaining to the characters and series you love.

I know if a creator of an anime I love advertised like this I wouldn't stop hounding them until they took it down and I would tell everyone I know whos interested to not watch until the unethical practices were fixed. The difference is that the game has ENDED.Therefore they can't introduce the material advertise.This is false advertisement because the trailers promised something for that PARTICULAR game and they didn't delivered.

This isn't the case here because the RWBY series is still ONGOING.Therefore they can still introduce stuff from the trailers that some point in the series.This isn't false advertisement becasuse the RWBY trailers were for the ENTIRE show.NOT simply for volume one.It have been false advertising if scenes from the VOLUME ONE trailer weren't present in volume one.

Not sure how I can make this any clearer. So you're fine if an anime maker made a sence in a trailer tkhat doesn't show up until the final season? You're okay with that if the scene is shown in the season announcment trailers?

If so, I will disagree with on the intellectual integrity of such a stance, but do not have the ability to convince you otherwise on this thread without going far off topic. If that were the case then no.I wouldn't be fine with it (Still don't think would be false advertisement though since if that were the case I should be able to sue the creator's of Nartuo for their pointless filler arcs).

However this isn't the case with RWBY.Seeing as were still in the first season and this show meant to have a running time just as long as red vs blue (which is in the in the middle for its 12th season if my recall is good) if not longer. Filler arcs in Naruto are different, for one the anime deleivers on it's promise to follow the manga. Naruto aside, you have a flaw here then.

You're not okay with the announcment of a series having content from the final season, so where do you draw the line? Season Three? Four? Five?

I draw that line at 0 seasons, advertise what you are producing, not what you MIGHT produce in the possibly far future. Last time I checked.The series is still producing content. Just not the content you prefer.

Secondly again were still in the first season.In fact since where compairing to anime here this show clocks in at four episodes.So yea.I will to gave the show a little leeway