Talk:Color Naming Rule/@comment-18396318-20150912203930/@comment-18396318-20150914195527

Nathaniel is easy, it references God. By the rules we're using, we've alread said for Glynda that "holy" is good enough for white. You can't tell me "God" doesn't work for that, too.

LiveandSound, the flaw in your explanation is with the third criteria. It's not "means something that makes you think of a colour," it's "means a colour." The fourth criteria is "makes you think of a colour." The disagreement is whether the rules can be combined. My argument is that it never says you can chain and combine rules, and that apart from Glynda (who I think we have wrong), we never have to. If it doesn't say we can, and we never have to, we shouldn't assume that we can.

But again, I've made my opinion quite clear. If I'm honest, I seriously doubt that anything could disprove my statements, and if they could, I would probably be too stubborn to accept it. I just want the administration to consider what I've said, as well as remembering: the purpose of a wiki is to be informative. We should never state assumptions as facts.