Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-10317392-20130906010815/@comment-17727644-20130911162508

Zolnir wrote: Both of your theories are in my opinion, wrong. But this can't be proven until the actual episodes are out.

Beacon may or may not be a target. It is simply the biggest threat on the map to Roman's plans, and he may be highlighting it just because.

If Beacon is a target, Roman's motive will definitely not be attacking it. If this still isn't hint enough to you people, then I have nothing to say. Yes, because beacon is totally just going to ignore what's going on in Vale during an attack on the city when they have a school full of hunters/huntresses. That would totally make sense. They will just sit down and let whatever happen happen. Let's ignore the big-bad school that can totally roll roman and his forces over at a moment's notice because that totally makes the most tactical sense. Please. That's like trying to play chess while ignoring the enemy queen on the board and disregarding what she does. That's just plain stupidity. We already know  that Beacon will interfere with him like episode 1.

Also attacking is a option even if it's the simple objective to keep forces away from where he wants them to be. You can continue to disregard my theory if you want, but at least mine is plausible and makes sense as to why he would target beacon. Also why he would need far more men and White Fang. It's fine if your uncomfortable of not going out on a limb, but just because we're not - doesn't mean we shouldn't.