Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-210.4.98.158-20130906173718/@comment-22580009-20131014162941

The only problem with disproving the faunus theory is that it is impossible to have evidence against her being a faunus as long as she has her bow that could hid ears. Since faunus are essentially the same as humans, with the only physical difference being ears or horns, then anything that applies to humans applies to faunus. Evidence for her faunus nature however, like a bow twitch or her past with Adam (who appears to be a faunus), can stack up very high. She has every reason to hide it if she is a faunus, so the argument that she wouldn't is invalid immediately. Overall, we will probably see more evidence for her being a faunus as we go, but no argument against it will hold up. Until it is proven one way or the other in canon, all evidence points for it.