Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25266931-20170302050111/@comment-28288412-20170304153211

@KNN: Maki's point is that you have deviated from your own topic and the point of these threads yourself multiple times, criticising others for it but having no issue when you do it yourself. The dirty joke last thread and the whose doing who thing in this one being prominent examples of your own deviations. Criticising others for their's is hypocritical.

What Spirit means is that on your message wall, you have more power over those threads technically. Holding the ability to remove replies or close threads yourself (though in the case of warnings it would be incredibly stupid to should you receive them). However, mods and admins still have the power to do those things too. It will also not be a case of them being allowed to or not, any instance we would allow here we would allow on the message wall thread, you can remove unwanted replies, but I imagine it would be advisible to exercise caution when doing so.

You neglect to recall your own breaches of the rules KNN that we have let off with "slaps on the wrist". Accusations of sockpuppeting or harrasment from certain people with no evidence, other accusations from misinformation, misinterpretation or "bad memory", backhanded general insults, judging from the egotism act that has clearly agitated people for as long as it's been going on which you kept up ignoring their feelings towards it for your own enjoyment which would be considered flamebaiting. And I'm sure there's more from when I wasn't following this.

I have confidence that going forward, rule breaches executed regardless of the individual will be handled in a suitable manner, repeat offences earning wall warnings most likely. More severe action following that if necessary, but hopefully not.