Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-172.250.39.94-20131203204915/@comment-80.91.192.50-20141109205350

Sam445 wrote: There's a problem with Ruby's weapon, Crescent Rose: it has two very close blades. The goal of using a blade is to put a lot of pressure on as little a surface as possible, but having two blades that close will simply disperse the pressure applied by them across the surface between the blades.

To help you picture that, imagine a single sharp blade placed parralel to the ground. Now, you take a sheet of paper over it end pull the sheet toward the ground and doing so, slicing it. The pressure was applied along a single line on the fabric allowing for a clean cut. Now, repeat the experiment but before that, add a second sharp blade close to the first one. You'll notice that this time cutting (or ripping, that's what's gonna happen) the paper will be much harder than the first time and that a rectangle had formed on the sheet of paper whilst you were trying to slice it. That rectangle was formed by the distribution of the pressure applied by the blades on the sheet.

In short, the slicing ability of Crescent Rose is greatly impaired by it's twin blades.

I allready wrote about that, well not particulary that, about 2 blades connected to 1 on end. Most lol even not in ripping instead of slicing. Most lol in fact, that thing like that stuck in enemy's body when Ruby will hit them XD

I wonder, why they just didnt make Crescent Rose with 1 blade? Its non-symetrical allready, what the problem is here? Its most strange weapon in RWBY after Yang's, Mercury's, Fox's, and Blake's(in pistol form with blade turn to users, that means she can kill herself when shoting) suicidical weapons... oh, and Nora's weap too(funny BOOM, when she hit with shot in hammer form and grenade exploud right inside her chamber and haghly possibly detonate another grenades XD).