Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27397283-20151214072846/@comment-27397283-20160216045143

Phantomlink959 wrote: It is the same usage, more or less.

Faunus are not the thing you are saying. they are a naturally occuring sub-species of humans, trans-species implies they are human who THINK they are part animal. Um... That leads to a whole other debate on the actual origins of the Faunus. One of the biological requirements of two creatures being consideres part of the same species is the ability to produce fertile offspring. Thus far, we have seen no evidence of Faunus/human couples, much less offspring produced by the two, fertile or otherwise. So, that's a separate speculation in and of itself.