Thread:MalaCassida/@comment-25936766-20160923123833/@comment-25936766-20160923124703

MalaCassida wrote: But the point is its not actually or technically a wyvern. It would be considered by some fantasy universes as such but there is no overarching rule and most settings do not make that disctinction anyway

As a result the Gimm Dragon is actually and technically a dragon, nothing else. Except it is actually a wyvern. The difference is nearly-entirely physiological.

Whether other fantasy settings make or don't make a distinction is irrelevant, since the part you changed was stating how it was a wyvern as it would be considered in real life, not in most other fantasy universes.

And again, since Wyverns are still Dragons, whether you changed it or not your point remains: It's still technically a Dragon, so what's the point in changing it?