Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-27397283-20160214182542/@comment-27404453-20160220060856

Evnyofdeath wrote: Korrde wrote: But as I said previously, we can merely conjecture here. Trying to refute the possibility of Ruby being a Maiden at this point is like claiming that Raven's a Maiden or that Summer Rose was a Maiden. We have no evidence one way or the other. This entire debate is pointless as no one here knows where RT is going with the storyline beyond the fact that Ruby has gone with the remnants of JNPR and that RWBY has been split apart. As to who the Maidens are, no one knows anymore. Even Cinder's status as one is questionable as we don't know if she's even still alive. Good. Lord. The. Willful. Ignorance.

You are literally guilty of exactly what you accuse me of. There is no evidence for Ruby being a Maiden. Her powers are functionally and fundimentally different from what has been seen of a Maiden's power. We've seen exactly one Maiden's power. You say I'm willfully ignorant? Look in a mirror. We don't know how the other Maidens' powers present themselves. To say that based solely on what the Fall Maiden powers appeared to do, that all Maiden powers do the same is a lot more arrogant then anything I've put down.

There is as much evidence for Ruby being a Maiden as there is against. That is to say none at all. We have absolutely no evidence of her being a Maiden and absolutely no evidence of her not being a Maiden.

Your arrogance is astounding. You say I'm willfully ignorant. Unless you work for RT on RWBY as one of the writers then your arrogance and ignorance are much more impressive than anything I've written.

All I've done on this board is point out that there is no evidence either way. Your arrogance and ignorance are what is driving you to claim Ruby can't be a Maiden.

Good. Lord. The. Willful. Arrogance. And. Ignorance.