Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-14909251-20170522044827/@comment-28288412-20170523180351

Except in the majority, if not all if the use of the word typically was just poor phrasing, of the cases a Human-Faunus couple produce a child with Faunus traits.

As Raven's twin, being an identical twin is unnecessary as probability would also apply to Qrow and suggest that he would be born with a Faunus trait. But hey, let's just say Qrow wasn't one of those most cases and wasn't.

How about Yang? Raven and Tai's daughter? It may have happened with one relative which was unlikely but it wouldn't happen a second time right? Oh, looks like Yang doesn't have a Faunus trait either. Well that seems pretty damn unlikely, what are the chances of that?

Quite frankly, I don't support the Raven is a Faunus theory. It simply throws the fact given to us that in the majority of cases a Human-Faunus couple produce a Faunus child in our face and exploits a technicality that it may not be 100% twice just to let it happen. Personally, I would see it as an asspull. If they wanted Raven to be a Faunus and it to be more feasible, make it 50:50. A 50:50 chance of a Human-Faunus couple making a kid with or without Faunus traits. It would make it a hell of a lot more possible.