Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5726563-20130722022202/@comment-1387259-20130722043546

I'm not exactly one who contributes here, but I think I've heard/read enough to form an opinion. There are just a few things that a buraeucrat should and should not be doing, and Wikia themselves makes this pretty clear. Any crat who either abuses their power (e.g. banning for completely BS reasons/deleting pages and recreating them nearly verbatim to make some kind of "statement"), or refuses to communicate with the users (I have seen the notice on Rain's talk page regarding that), is just doing their job wrong, plain and simple, and they should just not have the position.

From reading this thread alone, I understand that Rain may have started off with good intentions, but that doesn't mean he still has them.

As one who really just is not here enough, I don't think I'm qualified to say who deserves the position more, and my opinion is really that of an outsider who understands the basics of bureaucratship, so I shall abstain on that matter.