Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-35941743-20190304195312/@comment-14909251-20190713005056

Lord Jaric wrote: Pyrrha was in no position to keep fighting at that point. Her sword had been destroyed and her Achilles tendon had been torn. She wouldn't be able to get up and fight after that no matter how much she wanted to. I think we all know Pyrrha would have kept fighting in every way possible and, given her strength and determination to stand in their way, it would be pretty dumb of Cinder to not eliminate a proven threat to their plans.

Megadracosaurus wrote: I’m sorry, but how did we go from discussing how Cinder will die to defending and justifying her atrocoties? Don't recall anybody actually doing that. We were arguing over whether her actions were worse, and thus less redeemable, than Darth Vader's. My point is her kills were all out of necessity. Someone needed to die for the success of the mission, someone needed to die for proving a relentless obstacle, and someone needed to die for being an unfortunate witness. Vader needlessly killed his own people for disappointing him. I especially don't care for the reasoning that the plans Cinder helped implement with regards to Vale could have had a greater proportionate effect had they not been obstructed than the actual effect of plans Vader helped implement.