Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-189.217.47.59-20161206085118/@comment-24573226-20161208181130

Bajarias.josef wrote: 189.217.47.59 wrote: Nikoli the rebel wrote: You should have more conversations with these people instead of us. It sounds like you made the thread to confirm your own bias. What did you expect us to say about our own critics? Didn't you read? I told you, I'm trying but I can't get a clear answer from them. This isn't the first time, I've been in at least six different threads and since nobody bothers to explain their issues with the wiki, I thought talking to the wiki itself might shed some light. It's the only option I had at this point and it did pay off. After all, the users aren't claiming innocence. Now I know how the wiki used to be and the details that lead people to dislike it in the past. So what are you on about bias? Now, now, chill down I think anon was perfectly valid in pushing back. Nikoli took a jab at them while disregarding the explanation already provided for what he was questioning.