Talk:Vault of the Spring Maiden/@comment-26017576-20180106060752/@comment-25936766-20180106173049

I think Hazel is simply pragmatic and practical. Just that.

>He didn't exactly oppose Sienna's death, he instead asked Adam why he didn't tell him beforehand about this change of plans. That was what really annoyed him, not Sienna's death in itself.

>He told Ren and Nora he didn't wish to fight either of them, but after a single "we will fight you" line Hazel starts fighting them with no complains or anything.

Basically, I feel Hazel doesn't, say, hate the idea of burning babies. But he doesn't like the idea of doing something if it's pretty much unnecesary. On the other hand, if something unnecesary is done anyway he's willing to roll with it, if with some annoyance.

Sienna's death, for example, was unnecesary to get the WF to help Salem. "Nobody needed to die today", like he said. And indeed, nobody needed to die today. Yet after she dies he doesn't complain, at most he complains about the lack of communication on Adam's part.