Talk:Roman Torchwick/@comment-24757748-20160306075933

From a story-telling standpoint, him being dead doesn't make sense. Unlike Cinder, we know nothing about his backstory other than that "he was a criminal on the run". We also don't know about his Semblance, or really much else.

All we know about him for certain is what he has done and said on-screen and that's about it. I severely doubt the writers would want to kill off a character with so much potential and hidden depths (what did he mean, "It's about what I can't afford to lose"!?)

So, let's just keep it as "eaten by Grimm", not only because it's funny, but because it's the most accurate assessment we have right now.