Thread:MalaCassida/@comment-25936766-20160923123833/@comment-25936766-20160923130653

MalaCassida wrote: Just because something becomes more common in the fictional usage does not give people the right to go over other creators head and determine for them what their fictional creatures "technically" are. ....But you know, in a way, that's what you're doing. Or do you have the right to go over whoever-made-that-article's head and determine what that fictional creature "technically" isn't?

The real life definition of Wyvern, that makes it different from Dragon: 2 legs, instead of 4 or none. Again, real life definition. By the real life definition, the Grimm Dragon is a Wyvern. Wyverns are still Dragons however, all that you changed simply said that it was a Wyvern more precisely.

Basically, what you're doing is like saying: "It's not a bear, it's a polar bear". The previous state was more like "it's not just a bear, it's a polar bear".