Talk:Dragon/@comment-410526-20160923164530/@comment-410526-20160923165429

Okay, I added a bit to the end that says "a subspecies or relative of dragons."

My main belief is that the contentious part of the previous revision is the use of the word "technically", which lead people to infer that the Rooster Teeth classification of Dragon was "technically" wrong, even if that wasn't the point we were trying to make. The current wording avoids that and also allows for more flexibility of meaning.