Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-24993958-20160121121228/@comment-27402783-20160131185334

Phantomlink959 wrote: Just making sure, wouldn't have beev the first time someone "borrrowed" another persons artwork for a weapon.

Once I get past your atttrocious spelling, the second weapon seems fine (although a shield with massive gaping holes is just asking for trouble)

The first one is... just awful. Technical details aside, using a rocket launcher as grieves and bracers is just a terrible idea overall, and don't even get me started on making the user a relative of one of the main canon characters.

I'm not a native speaker, so my grammer isn't the best and language isn'"t my strong suit anyway, but before you comment on my spelling check your keyboard because as bad as my spelling is, it doesn't deserve three t's in attrocious. No offence taken nor meant.

They aren't rocket launchers as grieves and bracers, more like pistons, like Zeus's fists from real steel or the 'weapons from those acrobats from the circus of crime from avengers assemble http://marvel.wikia.com/wiki/Ernesto_%26_Luigi_Gambonno_%28Earth-12041%29. The only explosive in the bazooka is to shoot the ammo, the grieves and bracers use the pistons from the rear-end which are used to push the claw into concrete or dirt.

The holes in the shield, can be filled, had no inspiration, only the half circles in the middle serve to hold the shield and I understand that it would leave the fingers bare but if they can deflect bullets on swords in that world than they can also avoid them with their fingers.

As for Port, well each their own opinion I guess, even if the OC would be used, it would never be one of importance anyway