Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-24573226-20171007211457/@comment-4403232-20171014025528

Grif made a speech and tried to stop it from happening. That is not how it played out. In your original post (which was since edited) in the Discord there was incorrect information stated including that I was going to step down if two bureaucrat nominations were made. I stated "There still hasn't been a consensus on what course of action is even going to be taken" the prior conversation had ended with people voicing various opinions and overall no one really knew what was even going on, in fact not even every administrator had even seen the discussion. Bureaucrat nominations have ALWAYS been open, this announcement did not allow for them, nor did any issues I raise suggest that nominations should be closed. A final plan on what we were actually doing (Phantom posting this nomination and users simply being encouraged to nominate bureaucrats with a handy list of them posted) finally came about AFTER me pointing out several unanswered questions as to what was occurring (my so-called speech Hazel mentioned). Prior to this, people were still discussing if we wanted to do an admin-vote, if we wanted to put bureaucrats as a reelection sort of system, and I said we needed to RESOLVE what EXACTLY we're doing before we say what date it's happening. Sorry if this reply comes off as a bit emotional, but I never tried to stop this.