Board Thread:Administrative Requests/@comment-27394867-20160307022626/@comment-3387274-20160311230736

New Mods may be found if we need them, or not if we don't. The situation with the staff is irelevant, and should not be taken account of in this debate.

For that matter, I see a lot of other things in this discussion that really shouldn't be here and are confusing the issue. The incidents that happened in the past are not so much directly relevant as context for the final warning issued in May. That was a valid warning at the time, and since then there has demonstratably been incidents occuring.

Therefore, the relevant points to consider, as far as I can see, are the following

1) Does the last warning that was issued in May still count as valid, ten months later, or should it have expired by now?

2) are the offences commited since that date serious enough to merit loss of position?

There's some overlap between the two, but as far as I can see, if you answer yes to either then you should support the removal of Nedz's position, whereas if you answer no to them then you should not. The situation is basically that simple.