Talk:Pyrrha Nikos/@comment-2001:1970:5C1C:2E00:30AD:7CE3:4DA6:7BB7-20170930210556/@comment-25936766-20170930230311

1) If you're sick of it, then be ready to get even more sick, because that's a fact. If even someone with such a definitive death like Pyrrha can revive, it means anyone can die and it wouldn't matter shit because they then just get revived and nothing bad ever happened.

It nullifies the consequences, it nullifies the impact, it nullifies the meaning of their deaths, and it makes the Grimm and the Villains look once again like harmless jokes, which Volume 3 went to great lengths to prove otherwise.

---

2) Death does lose it's impact when they revive characters. That's one of the things people criticized about Jon Snow's revival in Game of Thrones.

Game of Thrones, however, is a live-action show, with expensive actors under a contract. That's the reason they don't kill off characters as often as in Song of Ice and Fire. And the one dude who died and came back to life multiple times, "reviving" was part of his very character, which is different from this.

Pyrrha doesn't magically come back to life time and time again because some mysterious god seemingly wants her for something. She was just a skilled, but otherwise-normal Huntress, who was killed by Cinder.

3) The majority wouldn't. Even if they don't rage on the internet, making blog posts with 16 paragraphs raging about it and how the show is ruined, the implications of her - or anyone's - revivals (sans Penny the robot) would spark a huge wave of criticism.

Imagine you have people who practically want to shoot you. Would you like to deliberately make them angry?