Talk:Faunus/@comment-1299678-20161213001715

Y'know, I have to agree with Sapphirefirenation's post from a few days ago. It really doesn't sound like the WoR episode about Faunus retconned anything definitively.

I mean, Qrow said that a human and a Faunus producing offspring typically means the child will be a Faunus. As pointed out in that post, "typically" doesn't mean "exclusively". Unless Miles and Kerry come and outright confirm it, I'm not quite sure we should be jumping to conclusions from something that could be interpreted more than one way so easily. After all, when they said two Faunus reproducing would result in a random Faunus, a lot of people took it to mean that the child could take after any one of the parents, instead of the intended "literally any animal" meaning.

I'm not jumping to any conclusions here, and if I'm wrong, I'll happily own up to it, but... yeah, isn't it a little soon to start making assumptions?