Talk:Qrow Branwen/@comment-73.91.2.197-20161222044456/@comment-50.150.250.118-20161224172522

Wrong, Red Herrings can be used to mislead both the audience AND the characters. Do you know who Agatha Christie is? Do you watch any shows where they try and show you that it is one way only to turn it on its head and be something different...yea THAT is my point!

And do you think an author is going to just come out and say "Well, they are actually cousins, but they were raised as sisters." Of course not. You are supposed to go on the journey with the characters.

And I was not rude because he dissagrees with me, I was rude because he was rude first throwing his "Again, Word of God" back in my face as if I haven't read it a hundred times already. For someone with a minor in CREATIVE WRITING he should be able to come back with a better retort than the author has spoken and it is so. It isn't so until it is WRITTEN. The author is NOT going to give away every plot point. Monty only reaffirmed what Ruby and Yang already beleived to retort that Raven was not Summer.

I've watched the entire series about 3 times over and since Qrow appeared I've seen subtle hints that tell me he could secretly be her father. I've tried to unsee them also, becuase of what Monty has said, but they are still there. Hence my post.

I do know what a plot device is and I am not convinced that Ruby and Yang are half-sisters. Just coming back and telling me that just becuase Monty said different doesn't mean anything and if 'Lord Jaric' knew what a Red Herring was he would NOT have used that argument in the first place.

So shut it.