Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-26397825-20150719111502/@comment-24891101-20150725031020

Ah. I had thought I had misinterpreted you, but I had not. In any case, the TvT definition does not rule. Never outside of TvT have I seen the term used in the manner you are describing. I therefore dismiss it as the primary sense, coming as it does from a prescriptive source, in favor of the definition I have seen everywhere else on the internet, necessarily a descriptive one. I contend that TvT defined the term incorrectly, or, more precisely, used the wrong word to describe a phenomenon that did not have a name. Since the term they chose for it is confusing, I do not use it, and neither does the rest of the internet, as the R63 (in the generalized, Doylistic sense) used the term first.