Talk:Pyrrha Nikos/@comment-24098614-20150426021337/@comment-24891101-20150426054625

I've mentioned this before other places, Maki, but in case you didn't see, my suggestion was for Socratic dialogues among experienced members in the FAQ forum which exhaust the topic at hand. The rationale of having these be threads rather than an article is so they can address fan theories that the wiki cannot take an official position on (or rather, lend the imprimatur that an article would), since, as it stands, I see a conflict of interest with a page on the wiki. The intent is to make it slightly less democratic than a wiki would generally be, because the point of an FAQ is to have a central place where questions can be address that we've gotten tired of answering (like that old Yatsuhashi/WFL notion). This would also prevent a single page from growing out of control. It also allows us to exhaustively address an issue without relying on a single person's essay to remember all the aspects and variations. I envision it working by having a main thread in the FAQ forum where we request the creation of a thread to address a question and solicit collaborators, then a variety of threads of standard title where the question is exhausted. Plus, we put the FAQ forum to actual use.

I'm merely fully addressing my conception of how this would work, so some of the things I mentioned are obvious.

Then again, what the hell do I know about FAQ design?