Board Thread:Administrative Requests/@comment-28288412-20170117181816/@comment-4010415-20170120004223

SomeoneYouUsedToKnow wrote: 1-So you don't mean "X's Emblem looks like this and has Y color by default", you simply mean "X's Emblem looks like this"? You simply refer to the Design, and not the Color?

That should be clarified more. The way it's worded gives the impression it says the former, not that it is only referring to the design, the shape.

Pretty sure adding "Design" or "Shape" to the beginning of the explanatory sentences would help a lot. "Design confirmed in Merchandise", for example.

2-That sounds like a great idea, actually. Would help show X Emblem has appeared in Y and Z colors at different points.

Are you the only one working on that or do you have help?

As for whether that should bring with it the removal of the Emblem's page.........depends.

Maybe something like dividing it by Character (or small sets of Characters, for those that share Emblem designs), with the Emblem shown, and then a series of small image examples of where it has appeared and in what colors.

The biggest problem would be that it would make the page be huge in length, but that doesn't seem like a real problem. More scrolling, but not a real issue. 1. Yeah, that's our bad. I'll suggest changing it to say that we're talking about the shape.

2. I've been working on it alone. I asked if it'd be a good idea a while back, and when I was told yes, I started working on it. For right now, I believe I'm finished. I've tried to get people on the staff to take a look, but I dunno if they have or not.