Talk:Jacques Schnee/@comment-71.227.247.186-20161225011938/@comment-25936766-20161226133822

Ah, great, here's Alhazad seeing X and thinking Z again.

1-Why would Whitley plan anything regarding his sister's "downfall"? He never did anything at all besides standing like a dog besides his father.

And he didn't have to do anything to begin with, Weiss was the one that was practically asking to not remain the heiress in Jacques eyes, first ranting at the guests, summoning a Boarbatusk and almost hurting a guest, then rebelling against Jacques even more.

Unless the whole plan by Whitley was "Stand and do nothing, see what happens", he planned nothing, and did not need to plan anything to become the heir in her stead.

2-''Corrupt? Do you even know what Corrupt means?'' Whitley is anything but. All he's done so far, is remain at Jacques side, hands in his ass, saying nothing, doing nothing. And as he told Weiss, "it is foolish to not do as father asks".

Whitley is pretty much just an obedient dog to his father. There is no corruption at all.

3-Treachery? Read 1 and 2.

4-Whitley at the moment has just been an obedient dog. And like I said, he himself said it was foolish to not do what Jacques says. Why would Whitley kill him? There is no motive and there is no reason to do so from a writing standpoint.