Thread:75.108.127.161/@comment-4010415-20161122001724/@comment-25936766-20161122005137

SpiritedDreaming wrote:

You complain about us having consistency, well. This is us being consistant. This is different however. I'm not arguing the consistency in the rules's enforcement....just wondering if the case in particular was actually being racist, or was treated as such just due to having a word that is seen as racist.

It's like a bigger-scale version of what happens with Boy, which apparently is also seen as racist, yet not always used with racist/malicious intentions.