Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-14909251-20181014193722/@comment-25936766-20181018233027

VerBeeker wrote: 1) I definitely regret some of what I said...such as with Sky...and lambasting Kami...others not so much.

2) Biased...now that one confuses me.

3) But you were the one who decided to take a pot shot at Ark which ended up leading ultimately no where.

4) As for immaturity STYUK...it took sixteen people to convince you that you were in the wrong and even that was half-heartedly. But like I said...why continue making personal attacks. 1) I need some context to remember whatever you told Sky, but with Kami, don't worry, I doubt it's anything worth feeling guilty about.

2) You get an idea of someone, and you latch really hard on it, and when describing that person you love to use half-truths to make yourself look in the right.

Biased might not be the best word to describe that, but it was the one that came to mind first and I didn't feel like googling a dictionary.

3) Yeah....after Ark took a shot at Glitchee for the Nth time, just because he asked to get back on the subject. It's not all black and white you know.

I'll start thinking twice about taking pot shots at him like that once he starts thinking twice about being a salty whiner with only "little tolerance" to excuse himself.

--

4) If you bother to go into the Discord and read what the actual convo was though, the "convincing" was little more than insisting it was a mermaid when the tail was in itself hard to see, and due to the model's clothes's recycling done en-masse for background characters, it could well have been a long-skirt looking weird due to being underwater.

Plus the mermaid had fish fins too, which we had already seen by then that they were a Faunus trait of their own. So in total there was room for thinking twice about the whole "mermaid Faunus" thing.

But nooo, everyone decided it was a fish tail and then signed it into their Bible and treated as automatic truth, with no chance of being possibly wrong in any way, and just because I was the only one not suscribing to it, everyone started calling me a moron instead of actually explaining why I was "wrong" or showing any clear, irrefutable evidence of a fish tail.

Which you conveniently left out. And it's right there on the Discord too, easy to search in fact. It wasn't until much later that someone actually posted a pic that showed a true and obvious fish tail. Interestingly, the only one who actually did more than petty name-calling.

...........And then I kept being called an idiot just for suggesting that maybe the fish tail was an actual tail and the woman also had normal human legs, which has been done in fiction before and I even provided a picture as an example.