Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-27404492-20170511131216/@comment-25936766-20170619231523

141.134.109.210 wrote: @SomebodyYouUsedToKnow Yeah, until you read the entire comment I wrote to you I am not bothering with responses. I am not going to read a barrage of walls. Learn to summarize your arguments, or separate them more so they're not an eyesore to read.

I don't like people not reading everything the other person writes before writing a response. Then state your points without making wall after wall.

Even if you view it as garbage the person put time and effort in it and sometimes it contains actual usefull data. Time and effort changes nothing at all. A post made in 10 minutes can be more valuable and more worthy of respect or acknowledgement than one that took 3 hours.

I shall not promote the method you are using. Good, for I'm not promoting yours.

I prefer you take your time to read everything through before formulating a response. We're not racing against time. But people on the internet are under no obligation to read barrages of walls either. Thus, they have no reason to force themselves to do so.

Learn about rhetoric. If you want people to listen to you, do not bore them to death with walls. Get them interested, or state your points without making them lose interest.

No one is a politician here, no one is making 5-hours-long speeches to try to convince anyone. Making wall after wall only diminishes the motivation and interest of the audience, and makes your post more of a pain to read than it otherwise would be.