Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-26397825-20160518062840/@comment-27447621-20160522151236

Well, whatever we want to call it, the Semblance is probably going to stay the same. I don't care what classification Sawyer technically falls into, but the fact remains that Ray and I have made a case for the Semblance as it is right now, and I'm going to keep it as is.

So I ask again, is the rest of the character (that 80% which ISN'T a Semblance) all right? Can we get off of Semblances and move to the rest of the character so that this petty argument doesn't fill the entire thread?