Board Thread:Administrative Requests/@comment-6533159-20160226154300/@comment-24728342-20160226184216

I might be the only one to say that I oppose. Regardless of the lack in inactivity, she has not be informed of her lack of activity. Even in a real workplace environment you are given a chance to prove yourself before the board decides to either keep or remove you. She has received no formal message on her wall from any of the other admins or bureaucrats of this. If she has been warned ahead of time and still fails her responsibilities, then yes, removing her rights will be acceptable. But pushing this without giving her an opportunity for improvement isn't professional either.

Former administrators (Floobs, Flash, Cyrus) in the past have all been given the same treatment. Why should this be any different? They were all promptly warned ahead of time and given the chance to see if they still wished to continue to contribute to the wikia. In my final defense against this proposal, this removal nomination seems too sudden and "rushed", as it did not follow proper procedure. You don't dismiss someone without prior warning and giving them a chance to prove themselves.