Board Thread:Administrative Requests/@comment-24573226-20170620150929/@comment-24573226-20170621105631

I fail to see how a one week gap of the rollback position being officially listed after being given rollback means that you were never staff. However I did not know that rollback was granted you without your consent. That is a bit of a big deal and I would definitely liked to have known that sooner. Saying "I didn't ask for it in the first place" is far more straightforward than your responses have been.

But since you didn't just come out and say that I guess we will continue arguing over smaller things. The status of rollback was explained to you five months ago by several people, mostly members of staff. I do not see how you can claim to have not known prior to your message last week that this community sees rollback as staff and expects people with it to act as such. Even the link Chish posted has Grif telling you that rollback is more than a button. The fact that you were invited to participate in discussions about the wiki is another huge indicator. Though, I will also admit that "yada yada" was hardly as explicit as more recent messages.

As for the "real reason" you cite: that's just unattractive architecture you yourself built onto the same foundation as the rest: not being active as a rollback. Clearly, several community members see your behavior in this light, as you are being called both staff and not deserving of it. Guess you're the only one with your opinion, and with that being the case, you might encounter similar situations as you go through life perceiving obligations different from how others do.

Next time, it likely will help to stick to the basics and just say "I never asked to be nor wanted to be staff." You don't need to takes shots; that one aims true all on its own.