Talk:Fall/@comment-68.173.58.14-20151214132040/@comment-89.12.5.24-20151214175403

The theory does have hints backing it uo, IE Ozpin beeing much more than just a man, Ozpin hinted beeing super old, the old man matching Ozins colour scheme, the fact that Group has all that knwoledge,...

Thats more than enough to support a theory. I dont think the theory has good or even convincing arguments but its sufficieent to be called a theory which makes sense.

Besides there is a difference beetween a hypothesins becoming a theory and a hypothesis making sense. Just the  latter is not sufficient but nonetheless saying that a hypothesis which  does not have enough evidence to become a theory making no sense is still wrong if it does make sense but just doenst have enough evidence.

There is an  (though admittedly mostly theroetical) difference which can become important. I recommend reading some works about Epistemology.