Board Thread:Administrative Requests/@comment-4820209-20140508045005/@comment-10390252-20140509110712

ChishioKunrin wrote:

Besides, we've seen people object to popular speculation before. Remember? "I think Blake is a faunus!" "No, no matter what you say, I don't believe that Blake is a faunus! That's just stupid!" Speaking as someone who ended up with egg on his face over that particular incident, I think I ought to say that I had no problem with the article saying that she might be a Faunus (as it did but it was later changed).

There is speculation, like: "Cinder Fall is a renegade huntress" and then there is being just silly stuff, like: "Cinder is a Grimm in disguise" and vandalism. We actually have a very good signal-to-noise ratio on this site; those who choose to edit tend to be very conscientious and very little nonsense even gets as far as the forums. Certainly, I support keeping rubbish off of the main pages but what I object to is removing valid current speculation - such as the meanings hidden in the opening narration, the identity of White Cloak and the like.

Another suggested compromise: Perhaps we could have a seperate Meta category of pages, primarily with links to the relevant forum threads but also summarising the current competing (sensible) theories on the subject.