Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-27143816-20160216041923/@comment-27143816-20160216064658

Evnyofdeath wrote: Nightmarrionette wrote: Buddy you do not know how may times on the FNAF Wiki I have nailed someone with Occam's Razor, but let's look at the Facts here.

For SEW:

Ruby has Silver Eyes.

Qrow Mentions the SEW story to Ruby.

Weird stuff comes out of her eyes.

That's pretty much it

Now for WM:

White design on the attack and on the weird stuff coming out of her eyes.

Snowy transitions to the sweeping white wave going over Cinder and the Dragon.

Snowy look to the Weird things (still looks like some kind of blizzard)

Mentions "being frozen"

May explain a scene from Vol. 1's intro

Fits thematically if my theory is correct (Vol. 3 [Fall] falls to Vol. 4 [Winter] after the battle. Eventually Winter falls to Spring)

The answer seems pretty clear to me but I guess you can believe what you want. If you know how to use it why aren't you? You are making things more complicated than they need to be.

The Grimm Dragon is CLEARLY NOT FROZEN IN ICE. They specifically say it's not dead, but Frozen, and that it's still somehow attracting Grimm. If it had been encased in Ice they would have said that.

And as has already been said, Qrow did NOT tell Ruby the story of the Maidens. He told her the story of the Silver Eyed Warriors. If she was a Maiden Qrow would have told her that. Look up the Law of Conservation of Detail.

Ruby's "eye wings" looked NOTHING like snow. They're white. If anything white can be described as looking like snow, the walls of my bedroom look like snow (hint: they do not).

The V1 Intro was made with assets from the trailers. The scene you're talking about is Ruby kneeling infront of Summer's grave, with a phantom of Summer's cloak floating above her. That was the opening. I direct you to the tropes "Never Trust a Trailer" (since an opening is basically a trailer) and "Covers Always Lie".

Thematically your theory makes no sense. At all. You're arbitrarily assinging people as Maiden's based on superficial details.

To quote what appears to be your favorite damn sentence in the world.

"The answer seems pretty clear to me but I guess you can believe what you want".

You came up with your theory, but the instant people started poking holes in it you try to hide behind the "it's speculation" excuse. BECAUSE it's speculation we need to look at it closely to see if it has any merit. If we don't some third party could come along, see it, and assume it's a confirmed fact. Really?

We don't even get a clear look at the Dragon. We just see it's sillhoette on Ozpin's office. Remeber there were still other Grim there. I'm sure the chaos from them would attract other Grim. Also the Dragon could probably survive the freezing.

Qrow may not even know. Also I did look it up and, oh guess what. It said you can throw red herrings in. Guess what may be a red herring in that scene ( The Silver Eyes is a red herring in this instance as it is not Ruby's main power.)

It still looks like a blizzard to me but whatever.

I have never heard of either of those expressions before.

That is why I said IF it is correct. We have to use charcter traits, personality traits, quotes, and predictions to piece this together. No one has flat out said anything regarding the topic except Cinder is the Fall Maiden so people have to speculate to assume anyone is one of the other maidens.

That isn't my favourite sentence.

I'm not hiding. For most of this I don't put up a speculation sheild. I only say it's speculation when I make huge assumptions (like all Winter Maidens being SEW or my really bad Summer Maiden prediction.) Also why would anyone assume this is fact? It is in the Speculation House section.