Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-14138255-20160807005311/@comment-28345522-20161012214859

ChishioKunrin wrote:

6. NYCC SPOILERS: Probably (most likely, in my opinion) also wrong. Apparently, Cinder was shown with a scar on her face and a short haircut. Honestly, there's no reason to assume the silver eye powers did anything to her, AT ALL. Why do people keep assuming that the silver eye powers did something to her, when it has only been mentioned to affect Grimm?! If it turns out it did affect her, then whoopdeedoo I was wrong, but right now, there's literally no reason to assume it did. Why must people run around toting a theory like that as if there's actually a reason to think it, when there's not even a scrap of evidence? Sorry for the rant, but I'm just a little frustrated from being confused about why so many people think that. I don't like being confused, baffled, and not understanding the thought process behind something. Because she suddenly lost composure when Ruby activates her SEW. When the villian who has practically been untouchable and uberconfident up until this point suddenly has an outburst with this new obstacle, the automatic reaction is "Damn, must've fucked her up".

Not saying that Ruby did hurt Cinder, but there's not a whole lot evidence to support either side of the arguement.