Talk:Silver-Eyed Warrior/@comment-118.137.192.124-20200220162833/@comment-35434444-20200221110911

I can't say that I am familiar with it, and I'm sorry if I lent you the impression that I was claiming otherwise.

This is Jonathan mythology, you understand.

This is my story. And you're not part of it.

As for Oedipus situations, they are not the same as Oedipus complexes. And Odedipal situation doesn't nessessarily involve sexual relations at all. If you will remember, in the myth itself, Oedipus isn't aware at the time that Jocasta was his mother when he married her. So surely Freud was taking  liberties just as I was when he coined the name of the complex.

These things are not so set in stone as your own grasping attitude would like to dictate.

An Oedipal situation is where a parent and child (not nessessarily a mother and a son, but this combination is the most prevalent) mutually conspire to prolong the child's role as an infant. The child is petrifed by clutching at dependency. The parent is petrified by clutching at the youth and potentiality of the child. But are mutually stifiled by a fetish of premenance, and this is all too familiar in the modern era where it has been made sustainable.