Talk:Tri-Hard/@comment-24.2.59.133-20140816030741/@comment-25555436-20150425213821

^SITL...

1-Please do not respond to comments that are more than 3 months old. You are too smart to necropost, I hope. Basically, ignore anything older than January.

2-When speaking of the weapons's forms, it should be counted. Why? Because it is one of the weapons's forms, even if it can't be used effectively like a weapon in that form. And we would be counting the all weapons forms, not just the forms that are combat-effective.

The example the anon tried to use was a fail in itself to try to prove his point. We wouldn't count a sword as having 2 forms: In-sheath, and in-use. Hell no we would do that. Why? Because the sword itself still only has 1 form in the end, the only change is where it is: your hand, or your sheath, but in both cases it still only has 1 form. Now, if the sword can turn into an axe, then we could count it as having 2 forms: Sword form, and Axe form. If the sword has also a form where the blade retracts to turn it into a dagger, it would be counted as having 3 forms: Sword form, Axe form, Dagger form. See what I mean? The important aspect to count is the number of different forms the weapons have, not just the ones that can be any good in combat.

Now, as for why Crescent Rose's compact, non-combat form isn't counted, at least according to that anon, I don't know, though I do know this wiki is run by humans and as such isn't perfect. However, given his comment is from freaking August 2014, which would be about 8 months ago, it's very likely that that was changed.