Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5726563-20130722022202/@comment-1173941-20130723104853

Lunaries wrote: I state my stand here right at the start that I feel that Rain's priviledges should not be removed, first off, without him, there would not be this wiki, the template .etc, all the behind- the-scenes work. If this wiki looked cold and bleak would you even try to enter the chat? Sure, he had a few favourites here and there, but you could say that he needed some form of 'release' as he was busy editing the wiki, making sure it was top-notch and everything was running smoothly, and by his activeness in the chat (before the preview of the first episode), that he was extremly busy. But as the release that gew closer, (tiny bit of speculation here) he felt underappreciated that all the hours he put in, the hardwork, to make this wiki fine, was wasted. People were simply treating him as an object of indifference, that he was simply doing his job, but have you thought of this? He chipped in his free time, his own energy, and don't tell me he could have just not do it in the first place. He wanted to make this place a perfect place for this sister, as immature as she is (don't hit me ><) he still loved her and wanted the very best for her, does this not show that he puts his family above himself and he is a good man? Sure some of you do not like him and is understandable, however you simply see his bad deeds and rule out his good ones. Look at Thomas Edison for example, the famous inventor of the lightbulb (not really), but not many people speak of this 'bad' deeds, electrocuting animals to prove his points, mindless cruelty. The fact is this you guys are simply not acknowledging him for the good he has done but the bad, I hope you consider my points and if there is anything that does not seem clear or you feel is wrong please feel free to contact me.

~Luna I'll start off with your Thomas Edison argument. So you're saying you want us to remember Rain for his lies, and plagiarism?

And it's hard to see Good Deeds, really. Yes, he stylized the Wiki, but only because he wanted to. If he didn't, would I still be here? Yes. Would a lot of the regular contributors still be here? Yes. Would everyone else still be here? Probably not. Would more contributors be here? Probably. The Style is a pain on the eyes, really. And even if he didn't, another Admin would have.

Making the site look pretty, and copy-and-pasting Javascript snippets, doesn't excuse unfair bans, and allowing a hormonally unbalanced child to access their account, and do as she pleases. Nor does it excuse playing favorites, and being a hypocrite. When it comes to being a "Good Admin," Objectivity must be put above all else, even family. (In my opinion)