User blog comment:The LostWhisperer/Ship names/@comment-58.167.197.175-20140917035224/@comment-25857155-20150404184335

Incidentally, I like all of the ships you have just listed - not just because all of them are at least somewhat canon, either. It's fine if you don't think it'll work; if you don't mind humoring me a bit though, I would like to argue a couple points.

I must point out that there is a lot more to a relationship than the ability to reproduce. If that is your only reason for not supporting homo ships, then I believe your reasoning is flawed. If the ability to reproduce were all that mattered, many hetero relationships in our world would have ended long ago, including that of my own adoptive parents. I realize this is anecdotal evidence, so it has little bearing, but bear with me.

What does it mean to you for a relationship to "make sense?" You did not give anything in the way of criteria for that, and listed only relationships that are widely accepted or heavily indicated as at least partially canon. Is that, along with the ability to reproduce, your only criteria for "making sense?" Allow me to also insist that a relationship requires emotional attraction as well as reproduction-based, and some relationships do not even have any physical attraction involved, even between young (heterosexual) married couples (I am once again using anecdotal evidence for this; pray forgive me), like a couple I know.

Ahh, this is a hard thing for me to argue about, as I am not too knowledgeable on the subject. ^.^;