Talk:Remnant Timeline/@comment-6533159-20160613174000/@comment-28288412-20160613174932

Your thoughts are valid General, but with more information being present than a year ago this page has more information than was previously present. That I imagine is why it has returned.

Personally I think only order of events and not times or dates should be kept on the page to minimise that problem. Nontheless, to address your example the great war name itself has a link to the relevant article with the quote referencing the 80 years back thing at the top of the page. Which is perhaps a good way of avoiding the citation problem.

Your opinion is valid and honestly I would like to hear the other criticisms and reasons the previous version of the timeline idea was removed so that this one may be improved and avoid those problems.

I will require reviewal often, removing as much unnescessary information as possible and including as much relevant information as possible, as has so far been done in regards to the minimisation of minor plot points, but I personally think it should be given a chance.