Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-4830106-20130810030606/@comment-86.47.23.139-20131121224943

From my understanding of the bacground to the SDC-White Fang  conflict that (and this is admittedly mere specultaion and possible over analysing on my part but) the conflict had been from my point of view grow from a cycle of events that escalated from the mutual hostlities.

My interpretation on how the conflict escalated to fullout agression to ilistrated it here is a piece of speculation i had been working on.

faunus protest and boycott organised by the White Fang cause concern amongst the heads of the SDC whom decide to hire a "Security Investigation agency" (SIA) to find out what the protesters are doing and monitor the White Fang's members acctivites bringing the reports to the SDC whom upon review decide to secretly replace faunus whom the "Security agency" say are related to and/or working with the White Fang and esculates there on.

the cycle of escalation as such follows this patern as far I can assume that is.

SDC pays SIA to spy on White Fang activites in most cases, more radical faunus members gain support and infulance, and white fang becomes more hostlie towards the SDC whom thus the fear of reprecusion decide to increase the SIA budget.