Thread:DemonicsFire/@comment-24573226-20170712054415/@comment-4023909-20170713122003

MiniDaggers wrote: Demonics, the first image on its own was not going to be removed. A component of the "joke" of it was its sexual suggestiveness. Not action, suggestiveness and of this you surely realise and acknowledge. That alone in the image itself was not enough to get it removed from the blog though.

Other users commented their distaste toward the artwork itself for its suggestiveness which they are fully allowed to do. Fairly understandable as well if the person who the suggestiveness is being put on we don't even known if she's 18 yet. Can be uncomfortable for people and not much of a joke anymore.

And speaking of uncomfortable and not much of a joke anymore: Your reaction to their distaste with solely the artwork shared is to say they can't take a joke and follow it up with another suggestive image, this time making the implication on the 17 year old and her 16 year old sister. Regardless of twist, you yourself realise that in order for the "joke" to be funny it must be a twist, a subversion of expectation, that expectation being inappropriate. Even if it doesn't carry it out, it is purposely meant to suggest it and it is not hard to see why that would make people uncomfortable or disgusted. Saying something is just a joke doesn't change the contents of it.

If people don't like something, yes they can ignore it, but when it is posted or shared on the internet for all to see they can also comment on it and expecting otherwise is ridiculous. That said, expressing distaste towards a work of art you merely shared is not a way of targetting you as you seem to believe by mentioning it was people who you think have something against you who commented (ignoring that most of the users comment on a wide array of things all over the wiki often).

By the way, telling users to "get the fuck out of here" is not something I would recommend doing regardless of putting a "lol" on the end of it or not. Arkantos95 was blunt and certainly didn't need to swear, but his comment was directed at the statement while yours was at the user. Both unnecessary, but saying such things towards another user is more serious than a statement. Not a warning, just a piece of advice to try and avoid repeating it.

And to conclude, no, this is not me just throwing my 2 cents in. This me attempting to explain so you fully understand why the chain was removed due to what transpired in it as well as why the things may have impacted people negatively despite not showing what it was suggesting. As for removing this message, I would not advise it. Although Hazel's message is intended as one user to another, but it does provide advise that really should be kept in mind.

So people didnt like it and it got renoved. If it was only haz that had a voice in it thats fine. Just feeks like the gang up was unneeded, both there and here.....

And ones again i wad joking abot "getting the fuck out". I allways joke, its what i do.

And it feels like a "my 2c" to me. Same stuff seid allready by others. Only needed haz here, not everyone elce. But as seid, its the net and everyones gots to have there voice out there, me aswell