Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5726563-20130722022202/@comment-10390252-20130722082911

I'm not the most prolific user of the Wiki but I have to say that the Chaos described here is not the person I see operating on the Wiki. The admin I know is professional and efficient and is probably responsible for stopping this site being buried under a tidal wave of fanon and speculation.

That said, I would agree that his interpersonal and communication skills need a lot of work. I think that any rollback he carries shoud always have an explanatory comment to explain why, just so that editors can learn and not commit the same error again. I also think that one should give someone the courtesy of an explanation for an edit if they ask for it. Especially if that person is the site owner.

I appreciate maintaining a Wiki is a difficult job and dealing with people with... troubled egos and whose self-image is wrapped up in their edits is difficult and, for this reason, I have given Chaos a lot of leeway.