Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25247233-20160513080632/@comment-26018514-20160524153329

Kyuubi10 wrote: 73.Anon.52 wrote:

Shane's letter can tell us what RT did, but it cannot tell us why. even in those situations he might know 100% and has told us are far too emotionally colored.

in other words: the only set of ethics we can truly question based off of the letter are Shane's. We just don't know why RT did what it did. The problem with that thought is that it doesn't take into account that both JJ and Kathleen made comments.

Kathleen tweeted the letter and stated it was all true, while JJ shared a snapchat picture which included a comment about how staff were being treated unfairly etc... Thus, the letter (at least the unfair treatment side) bears some weight of truth due to the confirmation of 2 other employees. Now, are you telling me they also were emotionally biased due to the death of Monty? Therefore in reply to Darkcloud, we know at least 2/3 of the story. Or if you still want to be as fair as possible, 1/2 of the story.

....

As I recall JJ's letter was mostly saying he had been falsely represented and he quit as opposed to was fired because he was offended by things such as his mere $700 payout for voice acting among other shenanigans...

I have not seen Kathleen's response, however her blanket approval does not confirm everything from every POV, and is far less than 1/2 the story, POV's just don't work that way.