Talk:Color Naming Rule/@comment-410526-20160901173103/@comment-25936766-20160901182655

Alright then, how about this: 1-We divide the list on 2 halves. The first half includes the characters whose names are officially confirmed to fit CNR, or are just extremely obvious (Emerald). While the 2nd half includes the characters whose color allusions are not officially confirmed and thus trying to explain how they fit CNR is speculation (Velvet).

Or 2-Mark any character on the list who is not officially confirmed how they fit CNR and whose color name is not obvious, with "speculation" or something similar, to indicate that the explanations for their color allusion are pure speculation.

After all, the very Editing Policies of this very wiki explicitly say: "all cases of speculation are to be labelled as such". And right now, there's no distinction between what entries are parroting confirmed color allusions (except for May's), and which ones are purely speculative.