Talk:Leonardo Lionheart/@comment-2602:306:3494:D090:4925:C075:CEBC:1FB-20180201223423/@comment-128.210.106.73-20180214211722

Short answer is a yes and no. Yes, his actions do indeed make him partially responsible for the Fall of Beacon, same as Watts. But I wouldn't bring the full brunt of responsibility on Leo, namely because Cinder and crew were the ones to execute the plan, and it's highly likely that Salem's pawns could have still infiltrated the Vytal Festival.

Cinder already commented that Tyrian and/or Hazel would have killed off the Mistral Huntsmen with or without Leo, so Leo just made it easier. However, in the case of Mistral's Hunters he is certainly responsible for that, AND for giving away the Spring Maidens location.