Board Thread:Administrative Requests/@comment-14909251-20170109045918/@comment-25936766-20170109051430

The Devil&#039;s Advocate WP wrote:

Articles existed on Kuchinashi and Windpath soon after they were mentioned in a World of Remnant episode and were contributed to by staff with no incident, with both being about as short as the page I created about Kuroyuri. Unlike Kuroyuri, we rightly had no reason to believe there would be any cause for expanding those articles in the near future and thus no point in creating them as they only stated what was already in the WoR episode. Regardless, Spirit, DA has a point. This is yet another problem of inconsistency.

1) If Kuchinashi and Windpath have articles, even though they have pretty much just been mentioned and don't show signs of being plot-important anytime soon, then Kuroyuri should have one, especially since it's clear it's at least showing signs of showing up.

2) If Kuroyuri cannot have one since "it's too soon, let's wait until it shows up", then why do Kuchinashi and Windpath have articles when they are less likely to show up?

DA is right, there must be a policy, an official, written policy for Articles. What is sufficient for an Article to be made? What makes a potential article a bad idea in comparison even if they meet similar criteria? Questions like that.

No one would've wasted time if someone had asked in the comments.....but no one would've wasted time doing that if there was a written policy from the start.