Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-72.69.34.104-20160921225807/@comment-25396609-20160924183729

My arguments were as to why dust would not work as a primary material for a weapon, as it would degrade over time or be accidentally detonated. Directly tying in to the argument against the shield.

Tone matters almost as much as (if not more than) notes stating the purpose; because the tone is what determines how people interpret things.

Example, the very last sentence in the initial post

"Naturally, all of these are discovered by Ruby whilst she's fiddling about with Crocea Mors one day, mostly by accident."

Not would be, could be, might be, or theoretically. Outright are discovered. While he makes small notes saying they are just ideas, the tone implies they are fact. The whole thing reads as if the mentions of it being just an idea were an afterthought.