User blog comment:FinalWholockianGrrlGamer/Analysis: Red Like Roses Part II/@comment-25405817-20151021155147

"This attitude and the sentiments in this song are mutually exclusive. Now, some say that the feelings expressed in RLR2 are things that Ruby has healed from at this point; but if she's gotten over it, then they wouldn't write her entire theme song about it.  Now, I know, you never really get over the death of a parent; the gap will always be there.  But this despair, this hatred and bitterness-- it isn't there.  This isn't just some random song we're talking about here; this is Ruby's theme song.  You don't write a theme shong about something that stops being a big deal before the story even starts.  Therefore, we must conclude that this song is about something that happens in the future, not the past."

I couldn't read more from this blog after this paragraph. You're assuming that this song only applies to the present or the future. It does not. It applies to Ruby's past; especifically, the moment after Summer Rose passes away.

The fact that the song plays in a moment several years after Summer's passing has no bearing on the actual message of the song.

You're premise for this entire analysis is flawed. Therefor, I can't read the rest of it without seeing the same flaw reflected in everything else.