Talk:Weiss Schnee/@comment-189.134.226.123-20151007062853/@comment-3257939-20151007154301

Yes, just leaving an explanation about the scar not being present doesn't really confirms anything. It just makes things look more ambiguous: Was it an animation mistake? Does that mean that this can't be used as confirmation for anything? Or is it a confirmation that the scar was meant to be in her model already!? Does that mean this is confirmation that the scar happened before?

Several questions born from a few images without any proper explanation. We should really change that, otherwise, that anon will be just the first one to come asking about it.