Talk:Semblance/@comment-1458758-20151106004151/@comment-1458758-20151106005701

A nice idea, but until we get a more comprehensive note on Semblances, we can't even tell if that's true.

Like take Sun and Blake for example. Two people with the closest Semblances in similarity.

Now are they both Shadow type Semblances, or is just Blake's called Shadow and both considered Clone type or something like that? I can understand the concept of similarity in Semblances and I can unerstand the possibility that, if all are unique, there still might be a means by which they're grouped, but I think if people were to make a difference, there'd have to be more significant change than just an order of magnetude or some small variation.

I mean if you call Pyrrha's unique for being able to lift 30 cans in the air as opposed to someone who can lift 31, that's really just a distinction without a difference in my mind. An earthquake is still an earthquake if it's a 2.3 or a solid 7, ya know?