Talk:Raven Branwen/@comment-35455126-20190328193117/@comment-26397825-20190331052649

I don't believe we actually have one yet. Everyone has a cause they're fighting for, or refusing to fight for in Raven's case.

A neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. She doesn't feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most neutral characters exhibit a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil-after all, she would rather have good neighbors and rulers than evil ones. Still, she's not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way.

Some neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run.

Though I can see how you might argue for Raven to fit this lifestyle, the simple fact of the matter is that she's been actively breaking the law and leading a Chaotic lifestyle for almost 20 years. Plus she grew up in the bandit tribe and only went to Beacon to learn how to kill Hunstmen to protect the tribe, which means she was actively learning to kill the 'good' side.