Talk:Glynda Goodwitch/@comment-109.96.140.13-20160704001240

" Glynda seems to be a very judgmental person who assesses others based on her own personal impressions rather than actual data. For example, she assumes that Lie Ren  will not enjoy being paired with  Nora Valkyrie, seemingly unaware that the two have evidently been friends since childhood. Similarly, she tells  Ozpin  that, irrespective of the information in  Jaune Arc's  transcripts, she felt he was not ready for the challenge of the  Beacon Academy Initiation ."

I'd change that word with prejudiced. Also, she does not asses things, assesing is somewhat final. I'd use expresses.

Thirdly, whilst she was clearly un-aware that Ren and Nora were childhood friends, objectively, anyone could come to the same conclusion. Had the conversation in the first introduction of Ren and Nora not been specifically keyed in to show us she's his childhood friend, anyone would assume Nora just bothers Ren to the point where he just gives up.

Fourth but not last, it's her job, as a teacher and "deputy" (not established fact, so i'll just put it in "") to note that Jaune's transcript was weird. And she's 100% right. Had it not been for Pyrrha, Jaune would never be able to face his first two opponents let alone survive them.

Essentially Jaune got plot armoured from a made-to-die character (which is a bit shoddy), but that's neither here nor there.

I think that entire section is missrepresenting Glynda. She's a good teacher, she's obviously prejudiced, so what? Aren't we all. I think the text in between "-" represents more the opinion's of the one who wrote those lines rather than fact.