Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-95.149.5.49-20160729002848/@comment-26018514-20161003164449

DiegoAnime3000 wrote:

...Things like Saitama =/= Ruby are irrelevant. The point was that the Griffon crashed into the ship because it went after Ruby. Without her, that Griffon wouldn't get close to the ship at all.

...You say the Griffon actually survived the explosion and the reason why the ship was destroyed was because said Griffon teared everything apart from the inside. I say this isn't what happened but since both ideas can fit then we can't reach a conclusion over this. Either way, this is also irrelevant.

Yes, I understand the concept. It's what I've been arguing this whole time. The ship was Grimm-proof because the Grimm have no reason to attack it since there weren't any humans inside to kill apart from Roman and Neo but they were in control of their emotions meaning they can't become targets. And in the case that the Grimm go after them anyway: Roman destroyed the other two ships by commanding his own. Ember Celica, this proves the ship doesn't need an entire fleet to fire its cannons.

Again, Neo has little reasons to blame Cinder for Roman's death. The ship he stole greatly increased his chances of survival plus Neo was there to look after him. Everything went downhill because of Ruby's interferences. Whether the ship was truly Grimm-proof or if Ruby is Saitama are arguable and ultimately irrelevant.

1. No, Ruby =/= Saitama is relevant... you are claiming she can break normal physics interactions between Grimm and the ship, I am saying she can't. I don't give a shit about whether the ship would have been attacked in this situation normally, I am purely interested in "Grimm Proof", attacked or not in this situation is your argument, not mine.

2. She threw it through a steering device... those do not explode nor cause chain reaction explosions, and the Grimm even cried out before the explosions happened and we heard more breaking of objects... again, this is not irrelevant to my point: Grimm are capable of breaking airships

3. I'm not sure you do... Grimm still have reason to destroy it... it has people inside and is man made, that puts it on priority #4 at the highest in my list above, the ship normally would be priority #3 if it was used against the Grimm, and because of this experience that older Grimm would have it drops even lower on the Grimm priority list than #4.

Grimm want to kill even calm humans, they aren't immune, they just drop on the priority list. The airship was still a target, just not the first target.

4. I don't care about this at all, it is not and was not my point(as I said in #1). Disproving "Grimm-proof" is my point. the bolded portions of #'s 3 & 4 in combination by definition disprove "Grimm-proof";


 * 4: it is a valid target


 * 3: Grimm can damage it