Talk:The Lost Fable/@comment-29684190-20181206132900/@comment-35434444-20181211123503

Even if everything Ozpin has already lied about makes the rest look dubious, the fact that he made the lies is still infromation in of itself.

It makes sense to me to consider the infromation as spurious where applicable as long as it doesn't break the impartial tone of the article, but we can't act like he's lied until, like Antisocialmedia says, we have independantly verified it.

This wiki is dedicated to recording the facts in a productive and pragmatic way. That means that no matter how unreliable the canon sources appear, Word of God applies.

"We should get rid of this because it's probably wrong" may contain a valid critisim of RT's attempts at internal consistency, but would be hypocritical because doing so would undrmine our own standards of reflecting the series as it is presented to us, not as we interpret it.