Thread:99.156.168.24/@comment-27966940-20170611004305/@comment-99.156.168.24-20170611042939

Jaric was simply pointing out why people dismiss those kinds of theories, so when you basically dismissed it with a response that was pretty much dancing with hipocresy, I wondered if you at least were aware of that.

After all, if you don't want to listen to others, why would others want to listen to you? That's not how things work. You're just playing a petty shell game with who stopped listening to who first. Jaric popped into this conversation and told me why people didn't like a theory I hadn't stated a belief in and then offered evidence against a theory they hadn't heard. I don't interpret that as coming into a pre-existing conversation with the intent to listen to what the other persons have to say; I interpret that as coming into a conversation and telling the other persons they shouldn't be having the conversation. And they have yet to say anything to contradict that interpretation.

You talk a lot for someone whose only point has been that other people don't have to listen to what's being said. Do you see anything ironic about me reading and responding to your interjections about why you don't need to listen to me and how I'm not listening to you?