Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-3146930-20140708014442/@comment-14909251-20140721063431

DiegoAnime3000 wrote: I mentioned that early, also, the fact that her dad can always cut her ties with Team RWBY and Beacon as a threat to get her to do whatever he wants. But still, this is Team RWBY, even if one of them betrays the other, they will eventually forgive each other and just like Ruby said: "Team RWBY is back together."

It's not about who is more likely to betray the other, it's not happening! And even if it were to happen in the slightest way, the one to do it will have a pretty good reason that can be sympathize with. She will be forgiven and things will go back to normal. Natch, I expect any betrayal would be temprorary. At most it would last for a Volume, though more likely just span several chapters.

50.121.81.147 wrote: On one hand a racist jerk. The other a former terroist wanted for arson and highjacking. Which one is more morally correct here? I don't really agree with your characterization of Weiss, but I think the argument about "moral correctness" is why people get unreasonably heated about this matter. From my perspective, even if Blake was an assassin with a long list of kills, this would not inherently make her an immoral person. Her life circumstances and the circumstances of her people would likely make these kinds of actions seem morally acceptable if you were in the same position. The non-lethal acts would be even easier to justify morally like when the ANC was fighting apartheid. Talking about good and evil or moral and immoral distracts you from the motivations of the characters and the circumstances that inform those motivations.