User blog comment:Kamikaze839/Trouble and Solution/@comment-25160154-20140119041500

1) I agree on this point, but in most cases a screen shot and the same problem coming up multiple times for the same user can result punishment under the already set rules, namely harassment. Should it then be brought into main where all can see the chat rules will of course apply, with PM infractions taken into consideration.

2) On this point I try to keep wiki politics away from skype as much as possible, in other cases it should be treated as a secondary PM, the fanon however has been involved in many disputes, I myself can deny being involved in a fair few but when a dispute like this starts, especially over a user, there should be a set of middle ground rules. The main one being what happens on one chat must be dealt with on that chat, nothing should carry over. Ref the Ragna ban/block, if the users says something on one chat he/she expects it to be kept to those users, not spread over to the other chat and creating uproar, if it does the user who spread it should be dealt with and as for the speaker, the other wiki should be treated as a user. Personal attacks upon such user behind their back is to be frowned upon.

3) We have a system set up already which is the reverse of a nomination. But before this is put to use, if a significant number of the users should PM a mod with grievances against another a chat will be had with the offending mod detailing their infractions, if it continues the they will be asked to step down. Refusal at this point would then move to our system. A request is put up, non personal and factual support or opposition can be placed under it and after an appropriate amount of time the votes and their legitimacy will be counted up and judged upon. (Just liking of disliking the mod is not grounds for their removal)

4) This is a brilliant idea as it gives the mods a person to go to should they need reassurance of the rules and how to handle a situation that has been brought to their attention. Such a mod would need to be well versed in the rules. Can deal with situations without personal opinion getting in the way as well as the right amount of tact for dealing with sensitive matters. As I asked for with the Rollbacks a custom tag of head mod should be given to them to clearly label them as such. Once the admin positions have been filled out again then a vote or discussion should be had to elect this user. I say chat because it needs to be someone that the mods feel comfortable with mainly. The users should have a say though and a vote would be good for this with a chat deciding the nominees and possibly a final chat to settle any tie breakers.