Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-210.4.98.158-20130906173718/@comment-15897545-20130923195547

120.28.234.28 wrote: I really don't see why Blake has to be a Fauna to have a "deep character". All of the other characters have a motif going, except maybe Nora (Can't tell at this point, my brain auto-shuts off whenever she appears.)

Anyway, maybe she or her family were dust workers and treated horribly by a certain dust company, driven out of their home because its on top of a dust deposit, or had a Fauna friend who was killed by discrimination. The point being, there are so many ways to give her a good background other than being an oppressed Fauna. Just because someone is human doesn't mean they're exempt from human cruelty.

Looking at the thread's topic, I have to point out that the series in terms of animation has been anything but like the trailers. The episodes feature sharp, choppy movements (especially when running) so if the bow moved due something else like the wind the effect could have been greatly amplified beyond to what was intended. I'm not saying the series is bad or anything, just something to back my claim up.

I'm more likely to believe theories that she's a rebel or at least a Fauna sympathizer. What about an agent of an organization we haven't met yet? Asode from the cat theme, she also has a spy theme going about. After all, she wasn't on the catapults but later appeared in the forest...

the last paragraph really sums up what i personally believe, i would kinda prefer that she just be a sympathizer, as that would explain the cat like bow, and the eyes can kinda be explained with the same reasoning on why Rubys eyes are silver. and it really wouldnt come as a suprize at this point if she does turn out to be a fauna or half fauna as we all would more or less see it coming.