Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-25396609-20160923220030/@comment-25936766-20161118030842

Phantomlink959 wrote: Because Pyrrha is the one who said her semblance is speed; we don't know for a fact that's what it is. .....And yet, when Ruby said that she thinks Cinder didn't use her Semblance when she fought her in DDI, everyone instantly assumes and argues "Cinder didn't use her Semblance, period"

Why the inconsistency in logic here? When X says Z, it's "arguable", but when Y says Z, it's "fact"?