Board Thread:Episode Discussion/@comment-29684190-20191123161006/@comment-36040278-20191128012037

Jonathan Mott wrote: Yes, Jacques does deserve "what's coming to him." But unlike Shylock, I hope his retribution for stacking the system in his favour in order to support his callous and selfish motives is aborted or severely leniated so that the protagonists have the opportunity to be the bigger people and acknowledge that the sin is the enemy, not the sinner; bigotry is to be reviled, not the bigots.

Honestly, I think the best justice that could happen to him is the poetic kind. You don't have to kill him off, but let him lose everything (either they lose the company or Whitley undercuts him and takes over), then have him look around at where his life choices have left him; no friends, estranged from his family, completely alone and lonely.