Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-30231626-20161015043220/@comment-25936766-20161015230812

Kenichisora wrote: 1-First off i was replying to one of ther earlier quotes in that thread for the first point.

2-no, his family symbol isn't irrelevant. my point was that this new symbol is most likely a joke symbol. meaning that it wasn't intended to be a serious symbol. we have his family symbol for that.

3-lastly, yeah, its a lot of stuff in perspective. like vedran thell said, " Perspective. When a show only gives a character 4 outfits, I think having 2 of them share a theme qualifies as a lot. " 1-Then you should have quoted that one and/or responded to that one, not to mine. Like any rational person would've done.

2-Except his family Symbol is not the topic of discussion. Thus, it is irrelevant. And in my post, that you responded to, I did say how while Phantom said Emblems were made "for cool", the actual point was "for the lulz". No symbol is intended to be serious entirely. Some may be symbolic, like Yang's, others not so much, like Sun's.

3-Using quite literally the words posted by another user in the very same thread to try to save face. The most unoriginal, uncreative way to argue.

In his opinion, 2/4 is a lot. In my opinion, a lot means a high amount, regardless of percentage. Now, what's your opinion? Not Vedran's, but yours?