Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-27143816-20160216033644/@comment-27082610-20160603142414

The Devil&#039;s Advocate WP wrote:

Here's the problem: not a single fact is presented in this entire post that would go against this theory. All you have against this is speculation based on facts i.e. things we know to be canon, which is no different from my own speculation. You are just saying that your speculation is better than my speculation and that is just hubris. None of what you said is inherently more logical, just inherently more arrogant. Seriously, if anyone here can't take people presenting speculation you don't like because it goes against what you speculate in a forum specifically for speculation then you should just leave. When you use facts to back up an argument, it's no longer speculation, it's debating. Using facts instead of baseless assumptions is exactly what strengthens an argument.

If you can't take point-for-point criticism of baseless speculation vs an argument using established facts from the canon, you should leave, not me.