Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32346149-20191222183116/@comment-26018514-20200102070357

SizzlinBLT wrote: 73.Anon.52 wrote: You have a really skewed issues with "contradicts lore" and "contradicts lore how I headcanon it" Grimm only attacking humans and their creations, Grimm dying in captivity, Ghira stepping down five years prior to volume 1, Remnant being a world of creationism, aura being passive and countless other things RWBY has retconned were not SDC's personal headcanons. Name one time those were PROVEN wrong in a volume. Every rule is bound to have exceptions, and without a concrete 100% source who knows what motivates something, you cannot say what something does and why. I can tell you that no alcoholic will ever stop drinking, but that doesn't mean if I waltz into AA I won't see them not drinking.

Ghira stepping down 5 years ago wasn't disproven in the canon series, the circumstances he was hinted at leaving under were. Grimm dying in captivity was "disproven" as early as the white trailer if you want to argue it was semantically a retcon... which isn't possible as it predates that statement in the show itself.

Aura, as I have repeatedly explained to you has been explained horribly because it is BOTH. You are applying binary 2d logic to a 3 dimensional object. It was never once stated previous assertions about it were wrong because they are ALSO valid.

Creationism is likewise not disproven, because it is not preventing the evolution we were shown, Megoliaths aren't an upgraded Goliath in canon they have a unique name and are similar, but we also know Salem knows how to modify grimm as she wants and adding better mods for environment isn't something she wouldn't do.