Thread:MalaCassida/@comment-25936766-20160923123833

>it is technically a wyvern, a creature usually considered a subspecies or relative to the Dragon.

vs

>its appearance is that of a creature usually considered a subspecies or relative to the dragon, called a wyvern.

Why change the former? It's more to-the-point, and it's not confusing. Both are saying that the Grimm Dragon is actually a wyvern because of it's physiology.

Meanwhile, what you're trying to change it to, makes it sound like it's a Dragon that looks like a Wyvern, which is more confusing for newbs, and more redundant (Wyverns are still Dragons, nonetheless). 