Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32346149-20190606062554/@comment-26018514-20190607173153

SomeoneYouUsedToKnow wrote: 73.Anon.52 wrote: I wasn't lying, if you are capable of not cropping a quote beyond reason, I said she was "established" not that she changed, and that I define such a thing as development, especially when done in the volume introduced if the character is meant to die. because 0-1-0 is a change. So basically you're saying she was "established" and didn't change, which means she did change, which inmediately contradicts your own statement that she didn't change. My statement was said that way because Reika was accusing me of saying she changed to their standard, which I don't use(thus no change), to my standard a character doesn't need to change when created so long as they are properly established.