Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-27684451-20161121042030/@comment-70.198.47.251-20161212172349

Actually I think hickmans dictum is actually applicable to some degree because part of a theory could be wrong but another part could be incorrect, for instance Raven could know where the spring maiden is but she may not be with her tribe, or she could be with the tribe but may not be the other "powerful" individual, the relic could be in ozpin staff but not the cane itself, so no one would have known to take the cane, or oZoids cane could be a key to the relic somehow etc. A theory could be in part correct but have flawed variables quiche aren't accurate, so hickmans dictum would apply in the sense that a theory in this sense may be several theories combined togethere

For instance, Oscar may be raised by someone related to abother character but may not actually be family by blood, or he could be some sort of reincarnation/vessel for ozpin or he may be a relative the two could be mutually exclusive etc.