Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-83.70.203.112-20150923133208/@comment-24891101-20150923221024

Live: If you think my math wrong, do it yourself. My assumptions were simple: That the maps we have received are maps of the whole world, and that the projection was equirectangular (unsupported, but makes the math easier). I did a previous calculation based on older maps which yielded a far smaller size, but one still much larger than any city on Earth.

I invite specific critique of my methods, but I will not brook a general sense of distaste for where the math leads, or a vague complaint of the possibility the math is flawed. Point to specific flaws in methodology.