Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-25266931-20161119192054/@comment-25936766-20170319174629

KNN005 wrote: 1-But to me I think it's a least a little hypocritical to want her family to be safe (her tribe) yet go around doing actions that welcome readily make people hate and attack her family (tribe).

2-She would be mad if someone attacked them. But doesn't she see that no one would come after them if she didn't continue her tribe's ways of stealing and killing? 1-That's not hipocresy per se. They need to do so to live, to survive. Or at the very very least they think that. So regardless of her wanting them to be safe, and regardless of what their actions may bring, they have to do it anyway.

Take it as similar to a commander who is a father to his men, sending his soldiers into battle. They are likely to die, but he's got no choice but to do so.

2-Considering her apparent social darwinism, I think she would be happier if someone did attack them. Because at least, they are fighting them, instead of running away like chickens.