Talk:Inconsistencies/@comment-18396318-20130910204007/@comment-10317392-20130910220607

I don't think it is quite enough to be a proven inconsistency. For all we know, that "spell" Weiss cast, just makes the surface "sticky" so Ruby could run up it. We know so little about Dust, so we have been trying to avoid Dust related "inconsistencies" since, like it says at the top of the page, the evidence need to prove 100% that it is an inconsistency.