Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28776596-20161010231008/@comment-14138255-20161024062123

ChildOfTheMoon3 wrote: Wow. No.

I'm not even going to talk to this level of stupidity. No.

That whole phrase you used is stupid, and shows your stupidity, because every freaking snowflake is different. You're missing the point: Genders are being made on the fly to accomodate specific people all the time. "Special Snowflake" is a term used to describe people who do that, who make up improbably unique things just so they can be accepted (at least in this context).

Sex and gender are different, as ' Lord Jaric ' has stated, and you are wrong. I aknowledged my ignorance right as he stated it. You yourself didn't catch how there aren't as many genders as you thought.

Everything you said is wrong. So, we're technical here now? No, not technically a billion to be exact. There are still a lot, and more people will advance our languages and create words with how they and perhaps a few other they know specifically identify. There are more than can feasibly be labelled in our society. The most common labels are "he", "she", and "xe" in a pinch. It is impractical to create adjectives for 24+ genders. That whole comment above completely ignores entire groups of people altogether. I imagine so, but there was no better way I can think of to put it on an empty stomach and freezing at work.