Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-43891221-20190924195001/@comment-26018514-20191025233727

APersonWithoutAName wrote: fair enough. I personally didn't immediately interpret "sisterly bonding" as intercourse but I too share your disgust at that implication It was a crack at how if this is how they give us "Blake/Ruby" interaction I suppose this is how they give us that "sisterly bonding" we've been asking for too, but I don't support it either, however when discussing such things I'm not about to follow any unlabeled link into possible doujins.