Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-27404492-20170708180328/@comment-30530552-20170912205044

@SYUTK: The definition you're using in context was pretty close to how I was referring to it. However; I was talking specifically to the main villains, not general "antagonists" like Whitley and Jacques, specifically in relation to encounters specifically between two or more characters who have actually met each other in person and have some reason to want revenge and/or oppose someone, and specifically talking about vendettas between specifically our main heroes and our "important" villains, not internal ones until there are innumerous ones to warrant such a category (i.e, right now I'm not considering Ironwood against Weiss...who knows if he even knows yet anyway? Jacques + Ironwood I'll leave alone just because Jacques isn't important enough to me to give two shits about right now.)

This is why I say Weiss has 0 plot significance, because other than Banesaw, we have no major/named WF mooks who have met Weiss personally and posed any real threat to her. Sure, they may hate the name "Schnee," but until they meet the actual person and discern the issue and the person, we can't 100% say "vendetta" for that. If they know she opposes her father (which they wouldn't, because she has no plot significance as of now), then some would probably take that the "oh wow, she might not actually be racist...let's just kill the SDC leader instead and call it good." Not saying that is or will be the case, but it's one thought.

Questionable if Ruby still has an active vendetta against him, because while being called a "bitch" is bad, and havng her idol/role model get poisoned in front of her, I figured that Ruby might've exacted enough revenge with the tail cuttery to warrant no vendetta. If she does, however; you also missed the whole "I'm going to take you away and do horrible things to you, little Rose," thing.

Somehow, I hope the Emerald thing is real, because we'd get to see a scythe-wielder face off against someone who effectively uses extendable mini-scythes. And plus, Emerald would actually have relevance to main characters where said mains could actually do something about it (i.e, fight and win against her). I mean, common...save for Semblance mindfuckery, Emerald has not attacked anyone directly.

As for the "framing" deal, I really think it's just an issue of wording. Perhaps "sabotaged her reputation" would work better?