Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-14909251-20170522044827/@comment-14909251-20170527062311

SomeoneYouUsedToKnow wrote: Nah, I'm 100% sure they all would do the same unless they wanted to be pedantically-specific.

Example: If you saw a black person on the street, you would assume they are black and call them black if referring to their race/skin color. Even if 1 or both of heir parents are not black.

Same here. If it looks like a Faunus, people see it as one and call it one, regardless of parentesque. This is a rather bold assertion to make. I would certainly allow that they would refer to someone as Faunus for the sake of not revealing any mixed heritage or if it was a casual reference in the context of something else. However, a specific question concerning heritage is not the same.