Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-86.156.222.122-20161114230226/@comment-4010415-20161115000917

86.156.222.122 wrote: (e.g. Sun trailing Blake for over half a year, only to strike up casual conversation when he's finally revealed - srsly, it feels like the timeskip was barely a week) "casual conversation"

Blake: What are you doing here, Sun?

Sun: Diggin’ the new outfit, by the way! (pointing to her ears) Never did like the bow.

Blake: (slapping his hand away) Sun!

Sun: Geez!

Blake: Have you been following me?!

^ Blake was still angry with him and getting even more annoyed from him avoiding the question.

When he started explaining and she thought he understood what she was doing, she started calming down, but then he showed that he didn't understand, and she got angry again. Then, she realized that Sun actually had a point, and she calmed down and accepted it. Plus, she knows that she can't really get rid of him right now, since they're on a boat in the middle of the ocean.

I don't understand why people are so annoyed that Blake and Sun resolved that conflict as quickly as they did. It's like when people were annoyed that Blake and Yang easily resolved their conflict over Yang "breaking" Mercury's leg. Are people really that used to fictional stories dragging out conflict for the sake of making it last and milking it when all the characters really need to do is just sit down and talk for a minute? Blake and Sun communicated. They cleared up the misunderstandings that they both had, and that led to Blake being calmer and Sun understanding what she's really doing. What's wrong with that?