Talk:Characters/@comment-27082610-20180223043034/@comment-24993958-20180224112029

Mine has less chance of a violent backlash though. Let's use Qrow as an outlier.

Qrow in team STRQ raised complaints that the team disbanded and they have been doing theur own thing years before RWBY even began

Qrow in Oz's group raised complaints that team STRQ is a big part of his overall character even if none of it was shown on screen.

In my case, if we put Qrow in V3 since that's the one where he was both visible and had voiced lines, the worse that can happen is people look up the V2 section, think on it for a bit, scroll down to V3 and have a reaction in the vein of "oh that makes sense, he didn;t even have a model in V2".

As another example, regardless if we put Junior in V1 for the trailers or V2 for his cameo, it's easy enough for a browser to understand the logic behind both decisions. Character importance is...well still volatile, since depending on events in later volumes, we'll have debates weather a main character should go down a tier, a minor go up, an antagonist be taken out, and so on and so forth.

Overall mine is the least volatile and least spoiler y of these categories. Affiliation changes, character importance changes or allegiance changes won't alter the episodes they got introduced, even if we have to debate on what constitutes their defining introduction.