Thread:Badassmcawsome/@comment-7676619-20150428230928/@comment-4403232-20150429030358

What you view as "ban-baiting" is a personal opinion. Kain's not going to go try to make you change your mind, because it's your freedom to find an environment that matches with your opinions and viewpoints. He did deny it's ban-baiting, he's simply not going to forcibly alter your perception on fairness. The staff on this wiki does not find it to be so, and we're upfront with that and the rest of how we operate, allowing everyone to make the decision of where they want to go. This wiki, and by extension its chat isn't going to please everyone. We prefer users to make their own decisions, rather than beg them to agree with us.

A user can answer a reasonable question in a reasonable manner. Furthermore, a user can simply say "I'd rather not get into it" and the problem would have been solved. The ONLY time responses are NEEDED from users is when there's a matter like "Which account are you using" so that we don't have to go make a guess/decision on our own. We don't ban people for not wanting to chat about something.

As for PM being blocked, if an individual does not want to Private Message with another user, they aren't required to. Staff are no exception to this. Regardless, a user can always ask "Can you unblock PM because I would like to discuss this in private?" and there's a good chance (but not a requirement) that they'd go for it.

There's a level of self-responsibility that goes with with using the chatroom, and each wiki's chat will function differently than others. I'd recommend thinking over our policies and how we operate to see if this wiki is the sort of place you want to engage in. We don't force conversations and PMs, and we hold users to civil behavior as explained. That's how it is until the community as a whole makes a majority communication to change otherwise.