Talk:Roman Torchwick/@comment-24573226-20160816212234/@comment-410526-20160816220219

I just want to point out that just because a decision was made in the past doesn't necessarily mean it has to stay that way. The information might not have changed but the course of the discussion itself can definitely take a different course and lead to a different solution.

Personally, after reading through the replies from the past couple days and thinking it over, it's honestly starting to make sense changing the status to something like "Likely Deceased" or even just "Deceased". But I still think "Eaten by Grimm" is the best choice for now, but I haven't reached a (personal) decision yet.

Not starting a discussion on how best to do things even if the solution isn't ideal (which it clearly isn't, since we're having this conversation) just leads to things stagnating, which is something I really want to avoid on the Wiki. I don't want users (or admins!) to feel like things are set in stone and we shouldn't consider alternatives just because it was discussed before. People's minds can be changed.

@Mini: I agree this is probably better suited to a Thread than the Comments section of this article, but that's not really a huge deal.

@Tree: I'd definitely like for users to be involved. I don't think the admins should be able to lock people out of a decision just because they're an admin, but ultimately of course the decision will be up to them, especially if a consensus can't be reached amongst the users.