Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-24993958-20160711184711/@comment-24993958-20160808142504

VedranTheII wrote: You are still trying to make me defend a point I never made... I’m going to start quoting that till you get it stops being relevant; I am reasonably sure I never said your type of semblance (willingly induced eye for an eye) can’t happen in canon, just that it has not yet.



Does my lack of approval really bother you that much? I’m flattered, really, but you are placing an unhealthy amount of aggressiveness on my lack of approval when I’m reasonably sure I’ve never done anything to you safe for having a different opinion…in fact I can’t even recall asking you to change this semblance.