Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24573226-20160623204034/@comment-27812646-20160701051630

Late to the conversation. Been hard at work & stuff.

Anyways, as to the "Auraless" issue. Wouldn't it be really a matter of perseption? Wouldn't an "Auraless" person still have an aura, but be inverted instead of projected outward like everyone else? Sort of like a star vs a black hole, and thus invisible. If it is not perceivable, then according to perception it does not exist. That could lead to some interesting characteristics if done correctly.