Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-27511601-20170107190552/@comment-26018514-20170107231243

190.213.244.46 wrote: Yea there is really noting that suggest that RT didnt simply buy these assest frim the same source. It might hold weight if an actual "source" was quoted as saying it was stolen... but when you lack such evidence it's rather stupid to claim "X MUST be ripped off of Y because similarities..." when neither X or Y have claimed "We made X/Y entirely from the ground up"... especially when Y has been quoted as saying they bought things from other sources....

As for RT threatening litigation against accusers... Why wouldn't they?

thats like saying, "you know what, I don't care about my business, bad mouth it all you like..."

If no-one actually is willing to litigate, then they don't have evidence... if they did RT isn't so wealthy they could bury evidence from all comers...