Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-10317392-20130802044400/@comment-10545520-20130810141646

That...actually could be possible. Originally, I thought the Roosterteeth team might have just placed it in as a small easter egg; you know, as a one time use, throw away thing. It's unlikely that most people would have had the super eyesight and patience to read the thing anyways, and so as an award for those that did, they placed in a reference to Jekyll and Hyde as a reward for their perseverence.

After reading your reply though, I've gone back and taken a further look at the book. I was surprised when your idea that the book, while referencing Jekyll, might be about something else is actually backed up by the fact that while parts of Blake's book correspond with The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, the others do not quite match up. Although I could not make the words out clearly, I searched up the rest of the same passage. In her book, the two parts I could be sure on was the "...no" in the second-to-last line and the "..." at the end of the passage. The next paragraph from the same section of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde contains neither the word "no", nor a "...".

Now that I think of it, it may have well been that the Roosterteeth did both at the same time. They might have thrown in that little tidbit about Jekyll as an easter egg for those that took the time to look through it, yet, on purpose, chose a section that was generic enough that really, it could be about anything.

Kudos to you, RPGsrule, for pointing out that possibility to me. I stand enlightened.