Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-11188061-20131022161224/@comment-15108745-20131024052920

The Faunus might very well have been called "monsters" or "evil-born" because they arose from tainted humans in the fight against Grimm. However, society might have eventually seen that they were not Grimm-like or monsters because these people had a soul. If society were to continue calling them monsters, then the Faunus would have to share some features of the Grimm. But they just look like normal humans with animal features. Some of them might even use Aura like a normal human. Once this difference between the Faunus and the Grimm was noted and accepted (which would probably happen over some time), people would then label the Faunus as "animals." I suppose you could look at this as an old-habits-die-hard moment where society still feels uncomfortable with accepting Faunus but can't call them monsters. So there's still some enmity between the two parties, but now the term used is different.

Oh yeah, I expanded on that earlier post I made with some other thoughts. What are your opinions on the rest of what I wrote?