User blog comment:Jkphantom9/BREAKING NEWS: Gray's Journal on the Future of RWBY/@comment-99.120.149.4-20150311060620/@comment-25857155-20150312001132

You are wrong on several key points, Mr. In-Denial-Troll-Who-Does-Not-Use-Proper-Grammar. Please, allow me to elaborate on these points, and by all means feel free to offer retort or rebuttal as you see fit - I do enjoy tearing apart the arguments of the incompetent, as do several others here.
 * Point 1: Volumes 1 and 2 are by no means able to be considered masterpieces. If anything, they are trial runs, and were subject to occasional poor animation, system glitches, and even the occasional bout of laziness.
 * Point 2: Monty Oum was, in my eyes, a genius.  However, it is not the animated series RWBY for which I consider him to be so, but for the entire world of Remnant.  I have built worlds of my own, and know it to be no easy task.  Oum created the world of Remnant on a napkin, if stories are to be believed, and it has evolved into something I suspect I have no chance of matching for several years to come.  His animation is good, but that is not what makes RWBY what it is - rather, it is the world Oum created, and the world that Miles and Kerry will continue to elaborate on.
 * Point 3: You have offered no respect toward any single person on this site.  You do not even have the decency or dignity to offer an actual debate with factual points.  Rather, you argue just as the far-left politicians do, by basing everything off of conjecture and emotion.  State solid facts if you want to be considered as anything more than a troll or waste of space and time (though, apparently I enjoy having my time wasted).  The only time I have seen you even attempt to counter-argue, you offered up an ad-hominum argument toward Scout, who despite not having an account here, is considered by at least a few of us to be a valuable member of the site community.  When you offer no respect, you earn none - and so, you have none of mine.
 * Point 4: You have, on several occasions, shown yourself to put little thought or attention into your writing style, making several obvious grammatical errors that my twelve-year-old kid cousin could have called you on as easily as I did.  Your behavior and style both indicate you are, at most, in high-school, but that is still no excuse for such crudeness, sir.
 * Point 5: You verbally attacked Scout for being anonymous even though he is a regular poster.  I cannot say I have ever seen Scout behave the way you have, and he at the least has the decency to sign his posts so we can easily recognize him.  Instead, you skulk behind "Wikia Contributor" like it is an impenetrable shield, as though you do not realize everyone here can see your IP address and track it if we should so desire.  Believe me when I say it would be easy - especially with the sort of resources some of us have access to.  All I am trying to say with this is that if you do keep - shall we say - harassing the wiki, make sure you keep it impersonal as you have been doing.  I am not the type to easily hold a grudge, but I cannot speak for everyone on the site.

TL, DR? Of course. That's why you're 99.120.

Wait, Live, you already tracked him? I'm almost disappointed you beat me to it - unfortunately my own computer skills are sorely lacking, so it likely would have taken me quite a while. -_- I quite likely would have just asked someone else to do it for me anyway.