Board Thread:Episode Discussion/@comment-4141313-20190119003858/@comment-27640692-20190122035129

BlizzardDragon wrote: I would just like to point out how everyone, and I mean everyone that wasn't a diehard Adam Fanboy like EruptionFang, was clamouring for Adam to die for being superflous to the narrative and being a waste of a character.

But the minute he shows he has a brand/scar on his face, suddenly people complain about the fact he's been killed.

Honestly, why does he need to be alive to explore the meaning of the scar? Why can't it simply be a gateway, like say, they come across someone in Atlas with a similar scar, and Blake explains to the others just what happened to Adam and why he had that scar and what it means.

He doesn't need to be alive to explore the plot point. Bit of hyperbole, I'm not an Adam fanboy, but I also was not clamoring for him to die either.