Thread:SpiritedDreaming/@comment-41.133.255.67-20170122093344

I have to be honest, i don't think you've even watched RWBY. At the very least the things you said in  the above forum seem to indicate that. You spent a large amount of time bitching about chauvanism because you had an issue with the name of the maidens. Allow me to clarify some things for that tiny brain of yours.

1. You assumed that both males and females could be maidens when in actual fact only women, according to canon lore, can be maidens. How then, exactly, is it chauvanistic to refer to them as maidens when that is in actual fact what they are. To refer to them as guardians would be misleading because as you said its a gender neutral term and would be describing something only one gender can be.

2. How the actual fuck can you be that much of a bitch that you call chauvanism when the most powerful people in the world are always women? Isn't that in itself sexist that only women are allowed to be maidens? if men could get the powers too then guardians would be a better term but as it stands only women get to be maidens.

3. Even if both genders could get the powers it doesn't take a lot of brainpower to note that most of the characters in this show are female and are generally focused on more than the few male characters, one of which is a goofball who is constantly needing to get saved while theo ther has about three lines in the entire series.

KIndly go watch the series again from a neutral persepective and the next time you feel the need to open your gob think before you spout nonsense. 