Board Thread:Administrative Requests/@comment-4010415-20180225013443/@comment-24032889-20180225221251

I'll restate a common ground between different ideas. We put people who have had the most "prominent" roles in the plot at the top. Concerning BlizzardDragon, this will still put the most important people at the top. They get their Charmugs, but they're not put in a box with a header, whatever that's called, unless it's strictly one for protagonists and one for antagonists. However, we don't list anyone by affiliation anywhere because that just raises waaaayyyy too many darn questions on "why not over here?" and they're all subjective questions. Below the prominent characters, we list alphabetically. We put the rest of the characters in those affiliation boxes but based on alphabet, not affiliation. Or we don't use charmugs and that template and all, and we just go by lists of links to their pages The way we have it now looks organized. Yes. But there's so many darn subcategories taking up space, and as organized as it is, people are where they are subjectively, based on their current status. Yeah, I supported it in the proposal thread, but it's got more space dedicated to insignificant characters than significant ones even if the insignificants are underneath. Heck, the White Fang LT was a two episode role in V2 and he's at the top because he was an antagonist. (I put question marks on Raven and Ilia because they're still so newly important to the plot that it's hard to gauge exactly how much they'll be involved, but we know they'll matter somehow.)
 * RWBY/NJR, Qrow, Oscar, Ozpin, Sun, Ilia?, Raven?, Salem, Team WTCH, Adam.