Talk:Color Naming Rule/@comment-198.71.123.120-20160122180812/@comment-82.27.1.136-20160614140211

Um Im kinda worried about some peoples understanding of genetics, and applying it to faunus, there are three examples here I'd like to bring up.

Dominant vs recessive, if the Faunus atribute is like eyecolour then like brown dominating blue all hybrids would fall one side of the line, this is not the case as writers can choose if their characters express Faunus or human.

Blending, some atributes like height are a combination of two or more genes interacting and as a result the person would end up anywhere on a scale and yet that doesn't happen either, we only ever see 'full human' or 'full faunus'

Finally theres single gene dominance, like gender, where one gene or one chomosome can lead to a radicle shift, we don't call women 'full women' and men 'half men half women' because that wouldnt make sense though litterally its true at the genetic level. Likely something like this would be responsible for faunus, and in the case of two faunus sending this gene to the zygote there's some rectifying process that reverts one gene to the 'human' form meaning a cat and a dog faunus could have children and randomly it'd be either cat or dog but never a combiation.