Thread:PuffDragon/@comment-5431934-20130815220624/@comment-7472785-20130816141908

The disputed section:

"This is seen on numerous occasions throughout, from Junior flying several feet away (and breaking through a glass structure) due to the impact of Yang's punch, not augmented by Ember Celica,... "

Up to here I concede. But at 2:28 she activates, and that's before:

"...to her causing a ripple in the ground which subsequently knocked the surrounding opponents off their feet."

Which, read in context of the whole sentence, makes your insert only true for the first part of the sentence. Now, strictly speaking, one could argue that the insert only relays beckward and not forward, while I read it as applying to both parts - but that starts hair splitting.

Can we agree that my edit was not arbitrary, but had a basis also?

On a reconcilliatory note I suggest a change to:

"This is seen on numerous occasions throughout, from Junior flying several feet away (and breaking through a glass structure) due to the impact of Yang's punch, not yet augmented by Ember Celica, to her throwing the DJ across the room." {Because I believe that the latter feat is not augmented by EC's directional recoil effects}