Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-10544474-20140102052613/@comment-17727644-20140104063950

I wouldn't mind doing this. For Personality, I tend to be mid-range/long-range combat type person but I don't mind getting into close quarters if I am forced to. Introverted, loyal, leadership role, probably a programmer and knowledagable about people/places/facts/things. Tend to prefer small groups. Would I be a information broker or something? I tend to be neutral as it is in most conflicts so I play both sides of the field. So in Dungeons and Dragons terms, I'm technically True Neutral (good link to describe more of my personality really, I do kindof fit it nicely). I am most definitely as a surivior, always have a escape plan or exit, or quite a few things up my metaphorical sleeves.

As far as interests or other interesting story.. things that may help, I tend to look at not only what people say/do but also the reasons why they do the things they do. Fansciated with human psychology and socialogy. Learning robotics right now, and hopefully one day be at a research development lab working on robots maybe. Or perhaps a miitary contractor.

I tend to be argumentative alot as I like to poke/prod people to find out how they react and can at times be seen as... an elitest ***hole becuase of it. I can also be seen like that because if a person can't provide a solid evidence of their opinion, I won't budge on my side.

I do have some Narcissism tendences as well. I know I am pretty smart, above average inteligence - however I am cautionous because I know there is much... bigger fish out there. So one could say I'm humble in that regard.

As far as role or relationship, I don't mind being paired up for any sort of relationship. Full Author control over that sort of thing.

Yes that means I could probably be a villian/rebel leader/whatever you need. however if that's the case, I'm the type of leader whose smart - not as smart as grand admiral Thrawn, but I have similiar leadership traits.

I don't send troops to their deaths needlessly, everything is calculated and planned out. I also don't execute minons for their failures in missions as that's even worse waste of resources. I'll shoot someone who tries to do a coup however if I failed to talk them around or if they start shooting first.

While there is a chance I'll monologue, It won't be started by another person and will have already have implemented my plan. I don't monologue/rant unless I absoutely need to buy time, but even than, my plan has already been implemented and can't be stopped. Probably waiting for something else to happen first so it's not awkward silence while we wait.

I would not tell them about my plans and sure as hell don't gloat over my enemies. While it certainly sounds like I'm ruthless, I'm not - I'm kind to those that help me. If I promise to do something unless circumstances significantly change - I will do it, the question would be when that would happen.

If I sustain too many losses, I'll cut off the attack and withdraw to fight another day. I'll employ every type of warfare there is. Psychology, cyber, physical etc. In combat or a battle strategy, I would employ multiple plans so that if one plan fails, there is back ups in place. I probably would also employ smaller robots and drones beside mechs as well.