Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-26397825-20181027021942/@comment-24993958-20190206011715

Dai&#039;Vel wrote: Alright, well I may look over its limitations a bit more then.

'''Oh, hmm, well the mindread I thought was limited to immediate thought? Which means if you know that it is a part of the affect''', you just avoid thinking of specific things or purposely think of wrong things. But I could be wrong and need to go add that, for it was intended to be that way. Ah my mistake, I was thinking of peple that could look through past memories (which can still fall under mind reading) when I posted that. If they can only read imediate thoughts then no the way it is now is fine.