Talk:Qrow Branwen/@comment-98.249.185.89-20170613040727/@comment-98.249.185.89-20170614023500

I'm not saying that Monty or RT LIED. I'm saying that if you take the tweet IN CONTEXT they aren't going to reveal the whole story in shot.

Ruby and Yang grew up AS sisters - TO THEM they have the same father - TO THEM they are half-sisters. US as watchers only know what we are show so far and what we have been shown is that they are half-sisters becuase that is what they BELIEVE. IF (STRESS IF) Taiyang is not the father AND the revelation of Ruby's REAL father is a plot point - NO ONE at RT is going to confirm or deny who the father is - and they haven't. They've been asked point blank on MANY occastions and they DO NOT address it. You fail to see it. It was even a topic after Volume 4 and Miles shot down Barb for bringing it up - but it was NOT addressed!

If Monty took the time to shoot down a ridiculous theory of Yang secretly being Summer Rose - you would think that RT would step in and shoot down this theory - THEY HAVE NOT!

Again - you DESERATELY CLING to ONE SINGLE TWEET and you call it canon. It's laughable. How about you try writing your own story with a whole bunch of plots and twists and after you have the core structure of your story done ask yourself "What if one of my readers figures this out in chapter 3?" They tell me how would you respond to your reader. ARE YOU SERIOUSLY GOING TO TELL THEM THE WHOLE PLOT OF YOUR BOOK IF ITS PART OF THE LARGER NARATIVE - OF COURSE NOT!!!! YOU ARE GOING TO FRAME YOUR RESPONSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE INFORMATION THEY HAVE AT PRESENT TIME!

So - now when you stop using "WORD OF GOD" as your ONLY reason to try and shut me down - I'll stop being inflamitory - but until then YOU ARE THE INTIGATORS NOT I!