Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-27082610-20170424154014/@comment-25936766-20170524004907

MiniDaggers wrote: 1. Raven earned the qualification of Huntsman but doesn't go on missions which the qualification allows and is normally expected and occurs with most Huntsman.. She just got the qualification and left.

2. Trained yes, but those conditions are those of the missions they are employed to do.

3. No, that is not the distinction at all. If a farmer decided to do a bunch of research and gain knowledge equal to a doctor eventually, does that make him officially a doctor? Can he use the title, be allowed to officially treat people? No, because he doesn't have the qualifications.

4. Skilled Criminal =/= Huntsman. Just as a self trained criminal with skills equal to a military employed soldier does not make the criminal a soldier for the military.

5. But that's irrelevent to their occupation. Anyone belonging to any occupation can do more than what is involved in their occupation.

6. Being as skilled in something as something does not make you that something. Look at points 3 and 4.

7. Once again irrelevant. I could research how to and then help someone fix a pipe, but that doesn't make me a plumber.

8. No, because you shouldn't call him a Huntsman. He's a hunter, which in the RWBY universe is employed to hunt animals while Huntsman earn a qualification and license which then allow them to offficially be allowed to take on missions. 1-Irrelevant, all it does is prove my point: "Huntsmen" don't have to kill Grimm "for a living". Also, I seriously doubt one needs a "qualification"; In a pragmatic sense, no one will care if you have a pretty title or not as long as you're as tough as one.

In a more exemplary sense, RNJR don't have qualifications since they haven't even gone to their 2nd year and still were able to do a mission, with reward and everything.

2-Changes little. They are trained for different kinds of missions, like these and others, so what? The difference is still minimal beyond training, which you don't need to be a huntsman in practice.

3-In the case of doctos, that's the case. In the case of "Huntsmen"? Not really.

People hired to deal with Grimm. "Huntsmen" or no. And people won't care for qualifications, only for the skills.

4-I said, like a Huntsman in practice. In terms of strength, skills, and/or knowledge. Read what I say, man.

5-Which changes nothing here.

6-When it comes to Grimm, people won't give a damn about any qualifications, only those skills and stuff. When it comes to Grimm, if you got those skills, that's enough for most people beyond the pettishly picky.

7-But it means you can help people fix a pipe, no? Same here. A Hunter could do what a "Huntsman" can if they got the skills and strength. And people won't give a damn about any titles.

8-A male Hunter is a Huntsman. So it is correct to call a male Hunter a Huntsman. And I should call him a Huntsman since it is correct to do so.