Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-16277621-20130823040543/@comment-16502426-20130910225844

65.8.254.72 wrote: Oi oi, I never said she WASN'T related to the fauna. I simply said she most likely isn't full fauna, and is instead half or quarter even. This could lead to her NOT having the physical traits of fauna.

And again, those were possiblities. Like it or not, they're just as likely as the ridiculous theory of her having a second set of ears. Actually, I'd say they're more likely. Thank you, much nicer this time. I agree that she may or may not be full Fauna, but I personally think the Fauna ears at least are going to be there, given the twitching and stuff.

I guess there's two debates:

Fauna vs. part-Fauna vs. Human, which seems to be generally agreed upon as being one of the first two.

Double ears vs. fake Human ears vs. Human ears only, which seems to be the real point of contention right now.