Board Thread:Episode Discussion/@comment-4141313-20181229081856/@comment-4141313-20190110002405

Can't really talk right now since my phone is dying, but I'll keep this brief.

I wasn't talking from an in story perspective, nor was I talking about writing quality. I was saying that in the end the writers decide if they are redeemable, regardless of what they did. Vegeta was used as an access example of a character normally being irredeemable getting redeemed, meaning there is very little exemptions.

The Tukson thing is hypothetical, therefore from what we were given,his only similarity to Blake is his attempt to run, since Blake wanted to change things, where as far as we know Tukson just wanted to run after it got too grim.

The Penny argument was that we all know she's coming back, and if she does, then her death is ultimately less a mark against them since she was easily rebuilt, making it less killing a person and more killing Kenny or breaking something than killing them, and again I mean from a narrative sense, not a character sense.

Irl, I'd say throw em in jail for their own good. Since this is fiction, they so far seem redeemable.