Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-24993958-20150826074135/@comment-25555436-20150830223003

VedranTheII wrote: His character, if I remember correctly, does carry plants on him, so the aquaman comparison, aside from being a bit dated (aquaman stopped being useless on land around the time I was born), is pushing it. Yes, he won’t fight at his best unless he’s in the right spot, but Glynda for instance could be argued would be much more dangerous in a dust shop due to her semblance, that doesn’t mean she will barricade herself in one.

Some fighters require conditions to be more effective, compare and contrast  a sniper preferring to fight in places where they can have multiple clear shots on their target, with a swordsman being able to fight at full capacity regardless of place provided someone’s in range.

1-Current Aquaman, because DC was getting tired of the Superfriends Aquaman. Doesn't change anything. Aquaman's power is still useless in land unless you seriously stretch it, and all he has in such case is his super strength, stamina, and maybe a form of superjump. And think about it, if that's all he can do, better to call Superman or Green Lantern, no? They don't need to be in such specific conditions to be as good, or even better than Aquaman, unless they are specifically in Aquaman's territory and let's be honest, that rarely happens.

2-Glynda would be more effective in a junkyard. She has telekinesis, she's a Jedi, Dust Control is available to everyone. Example Failure on your part.

3-Yes. That's exactly the thing. You got X and Y. X can be good in a forest. But Y can be just as good everywhere, even in places with no plants, places where all X can do is punch people at best. So who you gonna call, the guy who is only good near trees, or the guy who doesn't need trees to get your job done and can be useful in all of Remnant?