Board Thread:Episode Discussion/@comment-14138255-20161225162718/@comment-26018514-20161227184449

SomeoneYouUsedToKnow wrote: GreyStark wrote: Yeah no. That would give away too much How? They can easily make an episode like Beginning of the End (or was it Fall?), focusing on the villains for 3/4s. Doesn't need to be focused on their past (for now), even just showing what they've been doing would be enough (to make up for Watts and Hazel not even being mentioned for at least 2/4s of the volume).

With the larger screentime, they can do it more easily. This season still has quite a lot of things the heroes need to do though... hell we have a 5th hero perspective(Ozpin), we haven't seen much of anything in Atlas or Vale, RNJR hasn't reached Mistral, and we only had the one episode show parts of Menagerie... and Tyrian is the first and only actual villain encounter... as of 7/12 episodes in.

I believe we didn't even see all of our heroes until episode 4, yet we still barely know more about their goals(Weiss/Blake), and haven't seen them in action(Yang, OZcar). Could the screentime really be justified? Would it even provide enough time for Adam, Salem, Sienna, Cinder, Tyrian, Watts, Albain's, Hazel, Em, and Merc?

Best case, this would be Sienna, Adam, Hazel, Albain's, Tyrian in one act/scene, while Salem, Cinder, Merc, Emerald, and Watt's are in another... assuming the Albain's go to Mistral, and that Watt's remains with Salem.