Board Thread:Administrative Requests/@comment-4820209-20140508045005/@comment-10390252-20140508145225

@ Sgt D Grif,

It only becomes a problem if there are people spamming articles with new speculation all the time. It isn't a problem if the article notes prior widely-supported fan theories and the current status of those theories. If anything it would be a legitimate piece of out-of-universe information about the subject of the article.

All it requires is for moderators to be firm on additions to 'Speculation' sections. Maybe it has to be approved in a forum thread first?

Features like this are what make this wiki something other than a dry, humourless and quite shallow 'unofficial database' site.