Board Thread:Speculation House/@comment-28831435-20160703040107/@comment-24993958-20160703201357

SomeoneYouUsedToKnow wrote:

2-We're not talking about 3D costs vs 2D costs, we're talking about a 2D version of RWBY. So any comparisons between the costs of a 3D show and a 2D Show are completely irrelevant. How is that remotely irrelevant? I questioned how much budget they could sink into an animated 2d RWBY in order to get comparable fight scenes to what we have.

Assuming they give them the same budget as they gave RWBY, but the costs are bigger to animate it, then a 2D RWBY as a whole will look overall worse than what we have, because the costs are higher.